ArticleTranslational cancer research2022
The efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with induction chemotherapy
Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive performance of MRI and CT radiomics in predicting the response to induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Epidemiology and treatment outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a low-incidence population - a DAHANCA analysis in Denmark 2000-2018.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2024Article
- Deletion of concurrent chemotherapy on the basis of sequential chemoradiotherapy for non-metastatic stage T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma in IMRT era.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Survival after induction chemotherapy in locoregional advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2023Review
- Paclitaxel combined with platinum (PTX) versus fluorouracil combined with cisplatin (PF) in the treatment of unresectable esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and toxicity of two different regimens.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is very sensitive to radiotherapy, patients with advanced NPC still need concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). The induction chemotherapy (IC) before CCRT can possiblly reduce the distant metastasis rate and improve the survival rate, but the results of studies varied. In this meta-analysis, we included controlled clinical studies to systematically evaluate the gain effect of it. Methods: The PubMed, Web of Science, Wiley online library, Elsevier, CNKI, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were electronically searched using keywords "neoadjuvant chemotherapy/induction chemotherapy" and "concurrent chemoradiotherapy" and "nasopharyngeal carcinoma" for articles from the date of establishment of the database to January, 2022. The inclusion criteria was established according to the PICOS principles. The complete response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were used as the main efficacy indicators for analysis. Results: Thirteen articles were included with a total of 7,197 patients, including 3,764 patients who took IC + CCRT and 3,433 patients who received CCRT alone. Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included had low risk of bias and 11 cohort studies had some concerns of risk. Meta-analysis showed that IC did not significantly increase the complete response rate [risk ratio (RR) =1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96-1.11, P=0.336], the pooled hazard ratio (HR) of IC as a prognostic factor predicting PFS was (HR =0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.96, P=0.214), and DMFS (HR =0.76, 95% CI: 0.57-0.96, P=0.004), and OS (HR =0.82, 95% CI: 0.73-0.92, P=0.036). IC increased the adverse effects experienced by patients (RR =1.22, 95% CI: 1.00-1.47, P=0.045). Discussion: The use of IC before CCRT provided a good effect for NPC patients with tumor, node & metastasis (TNM) stages III and IV, but there was no significant gain for patients with stage II. In addition, the application of IC will increase the toxicity in the oral cavity, digestive tract, and bone marrow, and should be well considered about the toleration of patients. Due to the limitations of this study, more literatures with better quality are needed for further explore into this topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.