ArticleTranslational cancer research2022
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of primary liver cancer.
Article in Translational cancer research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Next-generation dynamic and combinatorial nanotherapies for liver cancer: mechanisms, current advances and future perspectives.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Clinical value of systemic immunoinflammatory index in predicting recurrence and metastasis in patients with primary liver cancer.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Microwave ablation followed by cTACE in 5-cm HCC lesions: does a single-session approach affect liver function?La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- Hug sign in intraprocedural cone-beam-CT to predict short-term response to combined treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- Threatment Strategies for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: Ablation and its Combination Patterns.Journal of Cancer · 2024Review
- Association between the systemic immune inflammation index and recurrence or metastasis after interventional therapy in patients with primary liver cancer- a retrospective cohort study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- Article
- 2023 Update of Indian National Association for Study of the Liver Consensus on Management of Intermediate and Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Puri III Recommendations.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) intervention in prolonging the long-term survival and prognosis of patients with liver cancer are still controversy compared with the traditional interventional therapy of RFA alone. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy versus RFA alone. Methods: The related articles were searched in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Science Direct, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database, and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM). The Chinese and English search keywords included transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, TACE, radiofrequency ablation, RFA, primary liver cancer, and liver tumor. The five evaluation criteria of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Cochrane RoB 2.0 repeatedly independently evaluated the bias risks involved in the study and cross-checked the results. Results: A total of 7 articles were included, and the results of bias risk assessment show that 6 articles described the generation of random sequences in detail; There were 3 articles describing allocation concealment in detail; Operator blindness was used in 4 articles; The outcome indicators of 7 documents were complete. The 3-year overall survival rate of the RFA combined with TACE group was significantly better than that of the RFA group [odds ratio (OR) =1.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42-2.74, Z=4.05, P<0.0001]. The 1-year and 3-year tumor recurrence-free survival rates in the RFA combined with TACE group were significantly better than those in the RFA group (OR =1.88, 95% CI: 1.28-2.76, Z=3.23, P=0.001; OR =2.11, 95% CI: 1.37-3.24, Z=3.38, P=0.0007). There was no significant difference in the complication rate of patients with primary liver cancer between the RFA combined with TACE group and the RFA group (OR =0.79, 95% CI: 0.45-1.39, Z=0.81, P=0.42). Discussion: Meta-analysis results confirmed that TACE combined with RFA was safe and effective in the treatment of primary liver cancer, and can improve the overall survival and recurrence-free survival of patients with primary liver cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.