Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35706773›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2022

A non-parametric Hawkes model of the spread of Ebola in west Africa.

Junhyung Park, Adam W Chaffee, Ryan J Harrigan, Frederic Paik Schoenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Rates of SARS-CoV-2 transmission between and into California state prisons.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Current Landscape of Coccidioidomycosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Junhyung ParkDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Adam W ChaffeeDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ryan J HarriganInstitute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Frederic Paik SchoenbergDepartment of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently developed methods for the non-parametric estimation of Hawkes point process models facilitate their application for describing and forecasting the spread of epidemic diseases. We use data from the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa to evaluate how well a simple Hawkes point process model can forecast the spread of Ebola virus in Guinea, Sierra Leone, and Liberia. For comparison, SEIR models that fit previously to the same data are evaluated using identical metrics. To test the predictive power of each of the models, we simulate the ability to make near real-time predictions during an actual outbreak by using the first 75% of the data for estimation and the subsequent 25% of the data for evaluation. Forecasts generated from Hawkes models more accurately describe the spread of Ebola in each of the three countries investigated and result in a 38% reduction in RMSE for weekly case estimation across all countries when compared to SEIR models (total RMSE of 59.8 cases/week using SEIR compared to 37.1 for Hawkes). We demonstrate that the improved fit from Hawkes modeling cannot be attributed to overfitting and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of Hawkes models in general for forecasting the spread of epidemic diseases.

Indexed as

Compartmental modelsdisease epidemicsnon-parametric estimationpoint processesSEIR modelsself-exciting

Identifiers

PMID35706773
PMCPMC9041724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.