ReviewCureus2022
A Review of Pediatric Distal Radius Buckle Fractures and the Current Understanding of Angled Buckle Fractures.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in children with distal radius torus fractures: A case-control analysis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
- Imaging of pediatric musculoskeletal trauma: Age-specific considerations and challenges.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Review
- Article
- Digital Eye: Deep Learning for Detecting Physeal Fractures of the Pediatric Distal Radius.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distal radius buckle fractures (DRBFs) are the most common pediatric fractures and resemble the rounded portion of a Greek pillar or torus. They result from compressive forces applied to a child's highly plastic radius. DRBFs lack cortical and physeal disruption, which makes them relatively stable. In this review, we discuss angled DRBFs, a hypothesized subset of buckle fractures that results from an off-center compressive force. Some authors refute the existence of angled DRBFs, instead proposing new criteria for DRBF classification: measuring more than 1 cm away from the physis with two to three inflection points. Without universal diagnostic criteria, misdiagnosis is common, and the utilization of flexible treatment modalities is infrequent. Rigid immobilization with short-arm casting continues to be the mainstay of treatment in clinical practice. Yet, new protocols implementing removable elastic bandages have had comparable results to casting, including reduced healthcare expenditure, less stiffness, and improved convenience and patient tolerability. Despite the discrepancies in categorizing DRBFs, complication rates remain low, and diagnostic confusion insignificantly affects clinical outcomes. Angled DRBFs have been theorized to have intraphyseal extension, making them unstable Salter-Harris fractures. Radiographic evidence supporting or denying this claim is limited. Further research is essential to determine the stability of the angled DRBF subtype and whether they should continue to be defined and managed as buckle fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.