Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35706674›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2022

Land reversion and zoonotic spillover risk.

John E Vinson, Nicole L Gottdenker, Luis Fernando Chaves, RajReni B Kaul, Andrew M Kramer, John M Drake, Richard J Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Impact of Human Activities on Zoonotic Infection Transmissions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  5. Land reversion and zoonotic spillover risk.Royal Society open science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John E VinsonOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4319-6851
Nicole L GottdenkerCenter for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Luis Fernando ChavesInstituto Conmemorativo Gorgas de Estudios de la Salud, Apartado Postal 0816-15 02593, Panamá, República de Panamá.ORCID 0000-0002-5301-2764
RajReni B KaulOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Andrew M KramerCenter for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
John M DrakeOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4646-1235
Richard J HallOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deforestation alters wildlife communities and modifies human-wildlife interactions, often increasing zoonotic spillover potential. When deforested land reverts to forest, species composition differences between primary and regenerating (secondary) forest could alter spillover risk trajectory. We develop a mathematical model of land-use change, where habitats differ in their relative spillover risk, to understand how land reversion influences spillover risk. We apply this framework to scenarios where spillover risk is higher in deforested land than mature forest, reflecting higher relative abundance of highly competent species and/or increased human-wildlife encounters, and where regenerating forest has either very low or high spillover risk. We find the forest regeneration rate, the spillover risk of regenerating forest relative to deforested land, and how rapidly regenerating forest regains attributes of mature forest determine landscape-level spillover risk. When regenerating forest has a much lower spillover risk than deforested land, reversion lowers cumulative spillover risk, but instaneous spillover risk peaks earlier. However, when spillover risk is high in regenerating and cleared habitats, landscape-level spillover risk remains high, especially when cleared land is rapidly abandoned then slowly regenerates to mature forest. These results suggest that proactive wildlife management and awareness of human exposure risk in regenerating forests could be important tools for spillover mitigation.

Indexed as

disease managementland reversionland-use changezoonotic spillover

Identifiers

PMID35706674
PMCPMC9174719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.