Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35706640›Full record

ReviewJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Trends for in-office usage of pharmacological sedation agents in India: A narrative review.

Sakshi Joshi, Anil Gupta, Shalini Garg, Shikha Dogra

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Knowledge and awareness on neurolept anesthesia among dental students.Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sakshi JoshiDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Anil GuptaDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Shalini GargDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Shikha DograDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana, India.
Creative Commons · USShree Guru Gobind Singh Tricentenary University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Conscious sedation plays a significant role in in-office pharmacological behavior management for short-term procedures in children and apprehensive adults. The advantage conscious sedation provides is by improving quality of care provided by decreasing pain and anxiety while maintaining a patent airway and adequate spontaneous ventilation. Methodology: Present review was conducted to evaluate recent trends regarding use of in-office pharmacological sedation agents in India. A rigorous search was conducted through five electronic databases namely PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Database, and CTRI (Clinical Trial Registry - India). The search period was defined to be last 5 years, that is, from 1 Results: A total of 20 studies were identified following strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The included studies were evaluated for study design, speciality involved, number of individuals and their age groups, drugs compared along with route and dosage, procedures undertaken, place of study and results. Dental fraternity (13) had more number of trials conducted as compared to medical fraternity (7) in the stimulated period, with South Indian region having maximum trials registered or published. Conclusion: Midazolam was observed to the drug of choice for in-office sedation procedures in Indian Scenario. The limitation of study is that the published clinical studies are limited to a few states of India.

Indexed as

Conscious sedationIndiaMidazolam

Identifiers

PMID35706640
PMCPMC9191814
OpenAlexW4226250215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.