Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35706623›Full record

ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Validity of P-POSSUM in adult cancer surgery (PACS).

Sudipta Mukherjee, Ankit Kedia, Jyotsna Goswami, Arunangshu Chakraborty

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07542925 (Comparison of ASA, SORT, CACI, and P-POSSUM Scores for Predicting Postoperative Intensive Care Unit Requirement in Patients Undergoing Oncologic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07542925 recruitingnot on this map

Comparison of ASA, SORT, CACI, and P-POSSUM Scores for Predicting Postoperative Intensive Care Unit Requirement in Patients Undergoing Oncologic Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorDr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsNeoplasms, Postoperative Complications, Perioperative/Postoperative Complications, Intensive Care UnitsArmsRisk Assessment Scoring Systems (ASA, SORT, CACI, P-POSSUM, ECOG, NRS-2002)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. P-POSSUM for onco-surgeries: Does one suit fits all!Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sudipta MukherjeeDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Ankit KediaDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Jyotsna GoswamiDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Arunangshu ChakrabortyDepartment of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Tata Medical Center · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Objective prediction of postoperative morbidity and mortality can help clinicians for appropriate resource allocation and counseling of patients and their kin. Among different scoring systems, "Portsmouth- Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity" (P-POSSUM) includes both preoperative and intraoperative parameters for postoperative risk prediction. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of morbidity prediction by P-POSSUM in patients requiring intensive care after undergoing major surgeries for gastrointestinal and gynecological malignancies. Material and Methods: All adult patients (>18 years) undergoing gastrointestinal and gynecological cancer surgeries who were shifted to intensive care unit (ICU) or high dependency unit (HDU) for postoperative care were included and P-POSSUM was measured. Postoperative complications were graded as per Clavien-Dindo (CD) grading and have been compared with predicted complications as per P-POSSUM. Results: 143 patients were included in the study and the median P-POSSUM score was 35. The mean predicted morbidity was 55.28% (SD 25.54%) and the observed complications were 45.45%, which shows P- POSSUM has over predicted morbidity. At P-POSSUM values 60 and above, the incidence of major complications was 22.22%, compared to 6.25% for the rest (Odds ratio 4.286). Conclusion: P-POSSUM is not a reliable predictor of postoperative morbidity for patients undergoing major gynecological and gastrointestinal surgeries for cancer in our institution. But there is a significant incidence of major complications with P- POSSUM morbidity prediction score 60 or higher leading to the need for more stringent assessment and monitoring in that subgroup.

Indexed as

Malignancypostoperative carepostoperative complicationspostoperative morbidly

Identifiers

PMID35706623
PMCPMC9191788
OpenAlexW4226087217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.