Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35706600›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of lifestyle medicine

Adherence to Low-Fat, Vegan Diets in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: A Review.

Maximilian Andreas Storz

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of lifestyle medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maximilian Andreas StorzTübingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3277-0301

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-fat, vegan diets seem to be particularly effective for glycemic control and may significantly lower hemoglobin A1c levels in individuals with type 2 diabetes. However, health care providers report low levels of practice and argue that this diet is hard to follow. This controversy on the acceptability of low-fat vegan diets appears to be a significant barrier to its broader clinical implementation. This review investigated dropout and adherence rates in intervention studies using a low-fat vegan diet in individuals with type 2 diabetes. In contrast to the common belief that this diet is poorly accepted, this review suggests different findings. Dietary adherence appears to be good with approximately 50% of individuals meeting the criteria for high adherence in most studies. Adherence to a low-fat vegan diet was higher than adherence to conventional diets in several studies. Group support and regular supervision improve adherence. Moreover, relatively low dropout rates were found-indirectly indicating good acceptance and high patient interest in this particular dietary modification. Although this review has several important limitations, it appears inappropriate to associate low-fat, vegan diets with poor adherence in individuals with type 2 diabetes. With good and regular support, adherence rates are more than solid and physicians should advocate for this diet more frequently.

Indexed as

acceptanceadherencedropout ratelow-fatnutrition therapytype 2 diabetesvegan

Identifiers

PMID35706600
PMCPMC9189587
OpenAlexW3092659864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.