ReviewSeminars in plastic surgery2022
The Role of Skin Substitutes in Acute Burn and Reconstructive Burn Surgery: An Updated Comprehensive Review.
Review in Seminars in plastic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Indications for the use of dermal substitutes in patients with acute burns and in reconstructive surgery after burns: A systematic review.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyPooled it
- Multi-Centre, Single-Arm, Prospective Evaluation of Ovine Forestomach Matrix for the Treatment of Complex Wounds in the South Asian Population.International wound journal · 2026Article
- Living-Donor Allograft with Manual Grafting Technique for Extensive Pediatric Burns in Low-Resources Settings.Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2026Article
- Neo-Dermis Formation and Graft Timing After ADM Reconstruction: A Cohort Study with Histological Validation.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Bioengineered Skin from a Platelet-Derived Hydrogel Repairs Full Thickness Wounds in a Pre-Clinical Mouse Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Can Pure Silk Compete with the Established Mepilex AgEuropean burn journal · 2025Article
- The Role of Skin Substitutes in the Therapeutical Management of Burns Affecting Functional Areas.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Biological attributes required for epidermal regeneration: Evaluation of the next-generation autologous cell harvesting device.International wound journal · 2024Article
- Dermal Regeneration Template in the Management and Reconstruction of Burn Injuries and Complex Wounds: A Review.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Exploring the Place of Fish Skin Grafts with Omega-3 in Pediatric Wound Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Burns disrupt the protective skin barrier with consequent loss of cutaneous temperature regulation, infection prevention, evaporative losses, and other vital functions. Chronically, burns lead to scarring, contractures, pain, and impaired psychosocial well-being. Several skin substitutes are available and replace the skin and partially restore functional outcomes and improve cosmesis. We performed a literature review to update readers on biologic and synthetic skin substitutes to date applied in acute and reconstructive burn surgery. Improvement has been rapid in the development of skin substitutes in the last decade; however, no available skin substitute fulfills criteria as a perfect replacement for damaged skin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.