Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35706496›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Association of robot-assisted techniques with the accuracy rates of pedicle screw placement: A network pooling analysis.

Fei-Long Wei, Quan-You Gao, Wei Heng, Kai-Long Zhu, Fan Yang, Rui-Ming Du, Cheng-Pei Zhou, Ji-Xian Qian, Xiao-Dong Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Single-arm meta-analysis on robotic spine instrumentation for young patients.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025
    Pooled it
  6. A comparison of key performance metrics of major robotic platforms in spine surgery: a network meta-analysis of 14,462 screws.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Development and Clinical Feasibility of a Computer-Assisted Shape Design and Bending System for Spinal Fixation Rods.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Where are all the neurosurgery robots?Journal of robotic surgery · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fei-Long WeiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 569 Xinsi Road, Xi'an 710038, China.
Quan-You GaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 569 Xinsi Road, Xi'an 710038, China.
Wei HengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 569 Xinsi Road, Xi'an 710038, China.
Kai-Long ZhuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 569 Xinsi Road, Xi'an 710038, China.
Fan YangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 569 Xinsi Road, Xi'an 710038, China.
Rui-Ming DuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 569 Xinsi Road, Xi'an 710038, China.
Cheng-Pei ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 569 Xinsi Road, Xi'an 710038, China.
Ji-Xian QianDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 569 Xinsi Road, Xi'an 710038, China.
Xiao-Dong YanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, 569 Xinsi Road, Xi'an 710038, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Traditional paired meta-analyses have yielded inconsistent results for the safety and effectiveness of robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement due to the high heterogeneity within studies. This study evaluated the clinical effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement. Methods: The Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were searched with no language limitations from inception to Jan 4, 2022. Odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to report results. The main outcomes were accuracy of pedicle screw placement, proximal facet joint violation, and complications. The study protocol was published in PROSPERO (CRD42022301417). Findings: 26 trials including 2046 participants evaluating robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement were included in this study. Our pooled results showed that Renaissance (OR 2.86; [95% CI 1.79 to 4.57]) and TiRobot (OR 3.10; [95% CI 2.19 to 4.40]) yielded higher rates of perfect pedicle screw insertion (Grades A) than the conventional freehand technique. Renaissance (OR 2.82; [95% CI 1.51 to 5.25]) and TiRobot (OR 4.58; [95% CI 2.65 to 7.89]) yielded higher rates of clinically acceptable pedicle screw insertion (Grades A+B). However, ROSA, SpineAssist, and Orthobot were not associated with higher perfect pedicle screw insertion and clinically acceptable pedicle screw insertion rates. Robot-assisted techniques were associated with low rates of proximal facet joint violation (OR 0.18; [95% CI 0.10 to 0.32]; I Interpretation: Our findings suggest that only Renaissance and TiRobot systems are associated with high accuracy rates of pedicle screw placement. Robotic-assisted techniques hold great promise in spinal surgery due to their safety and effectiveness. Funding: This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81871818), Tangdu Hospital Seed Talent Program (Fei-Long Wei) and Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (No.2019JM-265).

Indexed as

AccuracyArtificial intelligenceCervical spinal surgeryRobot-assistSafety

Identifiers

PMID35706496
PMCPMC9193845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.