ArticleJournal of applied statistics2021
Feasibility as a mechanism for model identification and validation.
Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Goat flock abortion: a retrospective study at Abergelle Agricultural Research Center, Tigray, Ethiopia.BMC veterinary research · 2024Article
- Is paternal oxytocin an oxymoron? Oxytocin, vasopressin, testosterone, oestradiol and cortisol in emerging fatherhood.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- The T allele of TCF7L2 rs7903146 is associated with decreased glucose tolerance after bed rest in healthy older adults.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As new technologies permit the generation of hitherto unprecedented volumes of data (e.g. genome-wide association study data), researchers struggle to keep up with the added complexity and time commitment required for its analysis. For this reason, model selection commonly relies on machine learning and data-reduction techniques, which tend to afford models with obscure interpretations. Even in cases with straightforward explanatory variables, the so-called 'best' model produced by a given model-selection technique may fail to capture information of vital importance to the domain-specific questions at hand. Herein we propose a new concept for model selection,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.