ReviewThe American surgeon2023
Standardized Medical Coding Curriculum in Surgical Graduate Medical Education.
Review in The American surgeon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Underreporting of osteoporosis: an analysis of clinical coding and the effects of a quality improvement trial.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- Ready or Not, Here We Come: A Qualitative Study of the Transition From Graduate Medical Education to Independent Practice.Journal of graduate medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite the increasing importance of coding and billing in healthcare as a whole and calls from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) to emphasize systems-based practice, many surgical training programs have not prioritized coding and billing within their curricula. We aim to evaluate the performance of surgical residents and early career surgeons in coding and billing and to appraise interventions to improve coding and billing abilities within this group.
methodsA literature search from conception to March 15th, 2022 utilizing PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE was conducted to search for studies that evaluate surgical resident coding practices and interventions to improve practice management and financial competency.
resultsDiscrepancies in coding and billing ability are prominent between residents, surgeons, and professional coders. One study demonstrated coding accuracy of 76.5% for professional coders, 62.1% for surgical attendings, and 54.1% for surgical residents, whereas another study reported a 52.82% coding accuracy and residents. Resident performance in coding and billing was inferior to their more experienced surgical attending counterparts and professional coders. Surgical residents and fellows demonstrated significantly improved knowledge and confidence in coding following the administration of either individual or longitudinal educational interventions.
conclusionCoding and billing discrepancies among students, residents, and surgeons persist due to a lack of formalized training. Integration of standardized and mandated medical coding curricula and interventions within residency programs has great potential to improve surgical coding practices and should be a mandatory component of graduate medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.