Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35706039›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2022

Strategies to adapt and implement health system guidelines and recommendations: a scoping review.

Sydney Breneol, Janet A Curran, Robert Marten, Kirti Minocha, Catie Johnson, Helen Wong, Etienne V Langlois, Lori Wozney, C Marcela Vélez, Christine Cassidy and 6 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Regional research priorities for medication safety and pharmacovigilance in gulf cooperation council countries: a modified Delphi consensus study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sydney BreneolSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Janet A CurranSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. jacuran@dal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9977-0467
Robert MartenAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kirti MinochaSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Catie JohnsonSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Helen WongSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Etienne V LangloisPartnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Lori WozneyNova Scotia Health Authority Policy and Planning, Dartmouth, Canada.
C Marcela VélezFacultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Christine CassidySchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Sanjay JuvekarVadu Rural Health Program, KEM Hospital Research Centre, Pune, India.
Melissa RothfusW.K. Kellogg Health Science Library, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Lydia AziatoSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Lisa Keeping-BurkeDepartment of Nursing & Health Sciences, University of New Brunswick, St. John, Canada.
Samuel AdjorloloDepartment of Mental Health Nursing, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.
Daniel F Patiño-LugoFacultad de Medicina, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.

Funding

SPOR Evidence Alliance 201705GSR-386588-GSR-CEAJ-157857World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based health system guidelines are pivotal tools to help outline the important financial, policy and service components recommended to achieve a sustainable and resilient health system. However, not all guidelines are readily translatable into practice and/or policy without effective and tailored implementation and adaptation techniques. This scoping review mapped the evidence related to the adaptation and implementation of health system guidelines in low- and middle-income countries.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. A search strategy was implemented in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, CINAHL, LILACS (VHL Regional Portal), and Web of Science databases in late August 2020. We also searched sources of grey literature and reference lists of potentially relevant reviews. All findings were reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews.

resultsA total of 41 studies were included in the final set of papers. Common strategies were identified for adapting and implementing health system guidelines, related barriers and enablers, and indicators of success. The most common types of implementation strategies included education, clinical supervision, training and the formation of advisory groups. A paucity of reported information was also identified related to adaptation initiatives. Barriers to and enablers of implementation and adaptation were reported across studies, including the need for financial sustainability. Common approaches to evaluation were identified and included outcomes of interest at both the patient and health system level.

conclusionsThe findings from this review suggest several themes in the literature and identify a need for future research to strengthen the evidence base for improving the implementation and adaptation of health system guidelines in low- and middle-income countries. The findings can serve as a future resource for researchers seeking to evaluate implementation and adaptation of health system guidelines. Our findings also suggest that more effort may be required across research, policy and practice sectors to support the adaptation and implementation of health system guidelines to local contexts and health system arrangements in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicGovernment ProgramsHumansEvidence-informed guidelinesGlobal healthHealth systemsImplementation scienceScoping review

Identifiers

PMID35706039
PMCPMC9202131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.