Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35706033›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2022

Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System adult profile-57 (PROMIS-57).

Tingting Cai, Fulei Wu, Qingmei Huang, Chunfang Yu, Yang Yang, Feixia Ni, Changrong Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of PROMIS-29 in patients receiving kidney replacement therapy.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Hungarian PROMIS-29+2: psychometric properties and population reference values.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tingting Cai *School of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Fulei Wu *School of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Qingmei HuangSchool of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Chunfang YuDepartment of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guangxi, China.
Yang YangDepartment of Nursing, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Feixia NiSchool of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Changrong YuanSchool of Nursing, Fudan University, 305 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, 200032, China. yuancr@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8480-2569

Funding

the (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences no. 20YJCZH049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe PROMIS-57 is a commonly used self-reported instrument to solve the lack of generalizable and universal measures required to evaluate common symptoms and functions from patients' perspectives. This study aimed to translate the PROMIS-57 into Chinese and psychometrically test the translated instrument on patients with breast cancer.

methodsTranslation, cross‑cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the instrument were performed from June 2020 to June 2021. Eligible patients were recruited and completed the PROMIS-57, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), and a sociodemographic questionnaire.

resultsData from 602 patients with a mean age of 48.83 years were analyzed. Most domains in the PROMIS-57 showed an absence of floor and ceiling effects. Multi-trait scaling analysis demonstrated acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. The correlations between the PROMIS-57 scores and the selected FACT-B scores supported the criterion validity via the Pearson correlation test. Measurement invariance was supported by the absence of differential item functioning for most items. Cronbach's α of the domains ranged from 0.85-0.95. The unidimensional factor structure of all domains was supported using confirmatory factor analyses. Additionally, most items showed acceptable item information curves and item characteristics curve matrices.

conclusionThe Chinese version of the PROMIS-57 was found to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing common symptoms and functions among patients with breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsQuality of LifeAdultChinaFemaleHumansInformation SystemsMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesBreast cancerEvaluationHRQoLPatient-reported outcomes

Identifiers

PMID35706033
PMCPMC9202169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.