Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35705986›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2022

Projecting vaccine demand and impact for emerging zoonotic pathogens.

Anita Lerch, Quirine A Ten Bosch, Maïna L'Azou Jackson, Alison A Bettis, Mauro Bernuzzi, Georgina A V Murphy, Quan M Tran, John H Huber, Amir S Siraj, Gebbiena M Bron and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Anita LerchDepartment of Biological Sciences and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Quirine A Ten BoschQuantitative Veterinary Epidemiology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Maïna L'Azou JacksonCoalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), London, UK.
Alison A BettisCoalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), Oslo, Norway.
Mauro BernuzziCoalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), London, UK.
Georgina A V MurphyBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Quan M TranDepartment of Biological Sciences and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
John H HuberDepartment of Biological Sciences and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Amir S SirajDepartment of Biological Sciences and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Gebbiena M BronQuantitative Veterinary Epidemiology, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Margaret ElliottDepartment of Biological Sciences and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Carson S HartlageDepartment of Biological Sciences and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Sojung KohDepartment of Biological Sciences and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Kathyrn StrimbuDepartment of Biological Sciences and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Magdalene WaltersDepartment of Biological Sciences and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
T Alex PerkinsDepartment of Biological Sciences and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA. taperkins@nd.edu.
Sean M MooreDepartment of Biological Sciences and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA. smoore15@nd.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9062-6100
University of Notre Dame · USWageningen University & Research · NLCoalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations · NOGates Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite large outbreaks in humans seeming improbable for a number of zoonotic pathogens, several pose a concern due to their epidemiological characteristics and evolutionary potential. To enable effective responses to these pathogens in the event that they undergo future emergence, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations is advancing the development of vaccines for several pathogens prioritized by the World Health Organization. A major challenge in this pursuit is anticipating demand for a vaccine stockpile to support outbreak response.

methodsWe developed a modeling framework for outbreak response for emerging zoonoses under three reactive vaccination strategies to assess sustainable vaccine manufacturing needs, vaccine stockpile requirements, and the potential impact of the outbreak response. This framework incorporates geographically variable zoonotic spillover rates, human-to-human transmission, and the implementation of reactive vaccination campaigns in response to disease outbreaks. As proof of concept, we applied the framework to four priority pathogens: Lassa virus, Nipah virus, MERS coronavirus, and Rift Valley virus.

resultsAnnual vaccine regimen requirements for a population-wide strategy ranged from > 670,000 (95% prediction interval 0-3,630,000) regimens for Lassa virus to 1,190,000 (95% PrI 0-8,480,000) regimens for Rift Valley fever virus, while the regimens required for ring vaccination or targeting healthcare workers (HCWs) were several orders of magnitude lower (between 1/25 and 1/700) than those required by a population-wide strategy. For each pathogen and vaccination strategy, reactive vaccination typically prevented fewer than 10% of cases, because of their presently low R

conclusionsOur framework provides a flexible methodology for estimating vaccine stockpile needs and the geographic distribution of demand under a range of outbreak response scenarios. Uncertainties in our model estimates highlight several knowledge gaps that need to be addressed to target vulnerable populations more accurately. These include surveillance gaps that mask the true geographic distribution of each pathogen, details of key routes of spillover from animal reservoirs to humans, and the role of human-to-human transmission outside of healthcare settings. In addition, our estimates are based on the current epidemiology of each pathogen, but pathogen evolution could alter vaccine stockpile requirements.

Indexed as

EpidemicsMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusVaccinesAnimalsDisease OutbreaksHumansZoonosesVaccinesEmerging diseaseSpilloverVaccine demand modelingVaccine stockpileZoonosisZoonotic disease

Identifiers

PMID35705986
PMCPMC9200440
OpenAlexW4283020739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.