Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35705961›Full record

ReviewGlobalization and health2022

Private sector engagement in the COVID-19 response: experiences and lessons from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Nigeria, Senegal and Uganda.

Steven N Kabwama, Suzanne N Kiwanuka, Mala Ali Mapatano, Olufunmilayo I Fawole, Ibrahima Seck, Alice Namale, Rawlance Ndejjo, Susan Kizito, Fred Monje, Marc Bosonkie and 15 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Globalization and health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Steven N KabwamaDepartment of Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda. skabwama@musph.ac.ug.
Suzanne N KiwanukaDepartment of Health Policy Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Mala Ali MapatanoKinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Olufunmilayo I FawoleFaculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria.
Ibrahima SeckDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University Cheikh Antar Diop, Dakar, Senegal.
Alice NamaleDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Rawlance NdejjoDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Susan KizitoMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Fred MonjeMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Marc BosonkieKinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Landry EgbendeKinshasa School of Public Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Segun BelloFaculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria.
Eniola A BamgboyeFaculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria.
Magbagbeola D DairoFaculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria.
Ayo S AdebowaleFaculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria.
Mobolaji M SalawuFaculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria.
Rotimi F AfolabiFaculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria.
Issakha DialloDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University Cheikh Antar Diop, Dakar, Senegal.
Mamadou M M LeyeDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University Cheikh Antar Diop, Dakar, Senegal.
Youssou NdiayeDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University Cheikh Antar Diop, Dakar, Senegal.
Mane FallDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University Cheikh Antar Diop, Dakar, Senegal.
Oumar BassoumDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University Cheikh Antar Diop, Dakar, Senegal.
Tobias AlfvénDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
William SambisaBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, USA.
Rhoda K WanyenzeDepartment of Disease Control and Environmental Health, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrivate entities play a major role in health globally. However, their contribution has not been fully optimized to strengthen delivery of public health services. The COVID-19 pandemic has overwhelmed health systems and precipitated coalitions between public and private sectors to address critical gaps in the response. We conducted a study to document the public and private sector partnerships and engagements to inform current and future responses to public health emergencies.

methodsThis was a multi-country cross-sectional study conducted in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Nigeria, Senegal and Uganda between November 2020 and March 2021 to assess responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a scoping literature review and key informant interviews (KIIs) with private and public health sector stakeholders. The literature reviewed included COVID-19 country guidelines and response plans, program reports and peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed publications. KIIs elicited information on country approaches and response strategies specifically the engagement of the private sector in any of the strategic response operations.

resultsAcross the 4 countries, private sector strengthened laboratory systems, COVID-19 case management, risk communication and health service continuity. In the DRC and Nigeria, private entities supported contact tracing and surveillance activities. Across the 4 countries, the private sector supported expansion of access to COVID-19 testing services through establishing partnerships with the public health sector albeit at unregulated fees. In Senegal and Uganda, governments established partnerships with private sector to manufacture COVID-19 rapid diagnostic tests. The private sector also contributed to treatment and management of COVID-19 cases. In addition, private entities provided personal protective equipment, conducted risk communication to promote adherence to safety procedures and health promotion for health service continuity. However, there were concerns related to reporting, quality and cost of services, calling for quality and price regulation in the provision of services.

conclusionsThe private sector contributed to the COVID-19 response through engagement in COVID-19 surveillance and testing, management of COVID-19 cases, and health promotion to maintain health access. There is a need to develop regulatory frameworks for sustainable public-private engagements including regulation of pricing, quality assurance and alignment with national plans and priorities during response to epidemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19Private SectorCOVID-19 TestingCross-Sectional StudiesDemocratic Republic of the CongoHumansNigeriaPandemicsSenegalUgandaCOVID-19COVID-19 testingPrivate sectorPublic–private partnerships

Identifiers

PMID35705961
PMCPMC9199342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.