Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35705951›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2022

Multimodal data analysis reveals that pancreatobiliary-type ampullary adenocarcinoma resembles pancreatic adenocarcinoma and differs from cholangiocarcinoma.

Jun Cheng, Yize Mao, Wenhui Hong, Wanming Hu, Peng Shu, Kun Huang, Jingjing Yu, Maofen Jiang, Liqin Li, Wei Wang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Jun Cheng *National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5493-961X
Yize Mao *Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Wenhui Hong *National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Wanming Hu *Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Peng Shu *Molecular Laboratory, Beilun District People's Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Kun HuangDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jingjing YuDepartment of Pathology, Ningbo Yinzhou No.2 Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Maofen JiangDepartment of Pathology, Beilun District People's Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Liqin LiHuzhou Key Laboratory of Molecular Medicine, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou Hospital Affiliated With Zhejiang University, Huzhou, China. liliqin@hzhospital.com.
Wei WangDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China. wwscu1218@163.com.
Dong NiNational-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China. nidong@szu.edu.cn.
Shengping LiDepartment of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. lishp@sysucc.org.cn.
Shenzhen University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNAnhui Medical University · CNHuzhou Central Hospital · CNNingbo No. 2 Hospital · CNRegenstrief Institute · USUniversity of Nottingham Ningbo China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmpullary adenocarcinoma (AAC) arises from the ampulla of Vater where the pancreatic duct and bile duct join and empty into the duodenum. It can be classified into intestinal and pancreatobiliary types based on histopathology or immunohistochemistry. However, there are no biomarkers for further classification of pancreatobiliary-type AAC which has important implications for its treatment. We aimed to identify the tumor origin of pancreatobiliary-type AAC by systematically analyzing whole-slide images (WSIs), survival data, and genome sequencing data collected from multiple centers.

methodsThis study involved three experiments. First, we extracted quantitative and highly interpretable features from the tumor region in WSIs and constructed a histologic classifier to differentiate between pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) and cholangiocarcinoma. The histologic classifier was then applied to patients with pancreatobiliary-type AAC to infer the tumor origin. Secondly, we compared the overall survival of patients with pancreatobiliary-type AAC stratified by the adjuvant chemotherapy regimens designed for PAC or cholangiocarcinoma. Finally, we compared the mutation landscape of pancreatobiliary-type AAC with those of PAC and cholangiocarcinoma.

resultsThe histologic classifier accurately classified PAC and cholangiocarcinoma in both the internal and external validation sets (AUC > 0.99). All pancreatobiliary-type AACs (n = 45) were classified as PAC. The patients with pancreatobiliary-type AAC receiving regimens designed for PAC showed more favorable overall survival than those receiving regimens designed for cholangiocarcinoma in a multivariable Cox regression (hazard ratio = 7.24, 95% confidence interval: 1.28-40.78, P = 0.025). The results of mutation analysis showed that the mutation landscape of AAC was very similar to that of PAC but distinct from that of cholangiocarcinoma.

conclusionsThis multi-center study provides compelling evidence that pancreatobiliary-type AAC resembles PAC instead of cholangiocarcinoma in different aspects, which can guide the treatment selection and clinical trials planning for pancreatobiliary-type AAC.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAmpulla of VaterBile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaCommon Bile Duct NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticData AnalysisHumansPrognosisAdjuvant chemotherapyAmpullary adenocarcinomaComputational pathologyMutation landscapePancreatobiliary typeTumor origin

Identifiers

PMID35705951
PMCPMC9199183
OpenAlexW4282923065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.