Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35705947›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2022

International surveillance study in acute spinal cord injury confirms viability of multinational clinical trials.

Lucie Bourguignon, Bobo Tong, Fred Geisler, Martin Schubert, Frank Röhrich, Marion Saur, Norbert Weidner, Rüdiger Rupp, Yorck-Bernhard B Kalke, Rainer Abel and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gait analysis methods in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Exploring the Landscape of Biomarkers in Spinal Cord Injury.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 5 countries.

Lucie BourguignonDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology (D-HEST), ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Bobo TongInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Fred GeislerUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Martin SchubertSpinal Cord Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Lengghalde 2, 8006, Zürich, Switzerland.
Frank RöhrichBerufsgenossenschaftliche Klinik Bergmanstrost of Halle, Halle, Germany.
Marion SaurOrthopädische Klinik, Hessisch Lichtenau, Germany.
Norbert WeidnerSpinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rüdiger RuppSpinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Yorck-Bernhard B KalkeSpinal Cord Injury Center Orthopaedic Department, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Rainer AbelSpinal Cord Injury Center, Bayreuth, Germany.
Doris MaierSpinal Cord Injury Center, Trauma Center Murnau, Murnau, Germany.
Lukas GrassnerSpinal Cord Injury Center, Trauma Center Murnau, Murnau, Germany.
Harvinder S ChhabraSpine Service, Indian Spinal Injuries Centre, Sector C, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India.
Thomas LiebscherTreatment Centre for Spinal Cord Injuries, Trauma Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jacquelyn J CraggInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
EMSCI study group
John KramerInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Armin Curt *Spinal Cord Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Lengghalde 2, 8006, Zürich, Switzerland.
Catherine R Jutzeler *Department of Health Sciences and Technology (D-HEST), ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland. Catherine.Jutzeler@hest.ethz.ch.
Heidelberg University · DESIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Zurich · CHVancouver Coastal Health · CABayreuth Medical Center · DEBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Murnau · DEBG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle · DEDiagnostic and Treatment Centre Berlin · DEIndian Spinal Injuries Centre · INInnsbruck Medical University · ATUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe epidemiological international landscape of traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) has evolved over the last decades along with given inherent differences in acute care and rehabilitation across countries and jurisdictions. However, to what extent these differences may influence neurological and functional recovery as well as the integrity of international trials is unclear. The latter also relates to historical clinical data that are exploited to inform clinical trial design and as potential comparative data.

methodsEpidemiological and clinical data of individuals with traumatic and ischemic SCI enrolled in the European Multi-Center Study about Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI) were analyzed. Mixed-effect models were employed to account for the longitudinal nature of the data, efficiently handle missing data, and adjust for covariates. The primary outcomes comprised demographics/injury characteristics and standard scores to quantify neurological (i.e., motor and sensory scores examined according to the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury) and functional recovery (walking function). We externally validated our findings leveraging data from a completed North American landmark clinical trial.

resultsA total of 4601 patients with acute SCI were included. Over the course of 20 years, the ratio of male to female patients remained stable at 3:1, while the distribution of age at injury significantly shifted from unimodal (2001/02) to bimodal distribution (2019). The proportional distribution of injury severities and levels remained stable with the largest percentages of motor complete injuries. Both, the rate and pattern of neurological and functional recovery, remained unchanged throughout the surveillance period despite the increasing age at injury. The findings related to recovery profiles were confirmed by an external validation cohort (n=791). Lastly, we built an open-access and online surveillance platform ("Neurosurveillance") to interactively exploit the study results and beyond.

conclusionsDespite some epidemiological changes and considerable advances in clinical management and rehabilitation, the neurological and functional recovery following SCI has remained stable over the last two decades. Our study, including a newly created open-access and online surveillance tool, constitutes an unparalleled resource to inform clinical practice and implementation of forthcoming clinical trials targeting neural repair and plasticity in acute spinal cord injury.

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRecovery of FunctionWalkingAgingBenchmarkEpidemiological shiftFunctional recoveryNeurological recoverySpinal cord injurySurveillance study

Identifiers

PMID35705947
PMCPMC9202190
OpenAlexW4282921683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.