Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35705941›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2022

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the preventive behaviors in response to the COVID-19 pandemic among children and adolescents.

Feifei Li, Wei Liang, Ryan E Rhodes, Yanping Duan, Xiang Wang, Borui Shang, Yide Yang, Jiao Jiao, Min Yang, Rashmi Supriya and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Feifei Li *Center for Health and Exercise Science Research, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
Wei Liang *Center for Health and Exercise Science Research, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
Ryan E RhodesSchool of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
Yanping DuanCenter for Health and Exercise Science Research, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
Xiang WangDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, the Education University of Hong Kong, Ting Kok, Hong Kong, China.
Borui ShangDepartment of Social Sciences, Hebei Sport University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Yide YangKey Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Hunan Province, School of Medicine, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Jiao JiaoDr. Stephen Hui Research Centre for Physical Recreation and Wellness, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
Min YangDepartment of Sport, Physical Education and Health, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
Rashmi SupriyaCenter for Health and Exercise Science Research, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
Julien S BakerCenter for Health and Exercise Science Research, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China.
Longyan YiChina Institute of Sport and Health Science, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China. 2136@bsu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this review was to synthesize the empirical evidence of relevant studies related to preventive behaviors in response to the COVID-19 pandemic among children and adolescents. Further to this, we aimed to identify the demographic, psychological, and social and environmental correlates of such behaviors.

methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, eligible literature was identified by searching seven databases (PsycINFO, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PROSPERO registry platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov website) and reference list of included studies and relevant review papers from 1

resultsOf the 35,271 original papers, 23 eligible studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and all these studies were of moderate-to-high quality, of which 17 studies were further included into the quantitative analysis. Children and adolescents (6-20 yrs.) showed a poorer practice of COVID-19 preventive behaviors compared to younger adults (21-59 yrs.) with a small-to-medium effect size (SMD = -.25, 95%CI = -.41 to -.09). For the demographic correlates, children and adolescents' COVID-19 preventive practice was found to be significantly associated with gender (r = .14, 95%CI = .10 to .18), while not with age (r = -.02, 95%CI = -.14 to .10). Narratively, knowledge was found to be consistently and significantly correlated. For the psychological correlates, small-to-medium overall effects were identified for the association with attitudes (r = .26, 95%CI = .21 to .31) and perceived severity (r = .16, 95%CI = .01 to .30). For the family and social correlates, a non-significant association was identified between family economic status and COVID-19 preventive behaviors (r = .004, 95%CI = -.12 to .12).

conclusionsInterventions and relevant policies of promoting children and adolescent's preventive measures should be a priority. Further, empirical studies identifying the demographic, psychological, and family and social correlates of children and adolescents' preventive behaviors are needed.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorCOVID-19AdolescentAdultChildHumansPandemicsChildren and adolescentsCOVID-19DemographicsPreventive behaviorsPsychosocial factorsReview and meta-analysisSocial and environmental factors

Identifiers

PMID35705941
PMCPMC9200376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.