Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35705939›Full record

ReviewBMC biology2022

Time of day as a critical variable in biology.

Randy J Nelson, Jacob R Bumgarner, Jennifer A Liu, Jharnae A Love, O Hecmarie Meléndez-Fernández, Darius D Becker-Krail, William H Walker, James C Walton, A Courtney DeVries, Brian J Prendergast

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Light Cycle Phase Effects on Behavioral Responses to Stress Exposure in Rats.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Researchers need to better address time-of-day as a critical biological variable.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Randy J NelsonDepartment of Neuroscience, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA. randy.nelson@hsc.wvu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8194-4016
Jacob R BumgarnerDepartment of Neuroscience, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
Jennifer A LiuDepartment of Neuroscience, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
Jharnae A LoveDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago and Institute for Mind and Biology, IL, 60637, Chicago, USA.
O Hecmarie Meléndez-FernándezDepartment of Neuroscience, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
Darius D Becker-KrailDepartment of Neuroscience, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
William H WalkerDepartment of Neuroscience, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
James C WaltonDepartment of Neuroscience, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
A Courtney DeVriesDepartment of Neuroscience, Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
Brian J PrendergastDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago and Institute for Mind and Biology, IL, 60637, Chicago, USA.

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Laura F. Gibson · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
Stroke and Alzheimers Disease Related DementiasT32AG052375 · NIA · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Paul D Chantler, BERNARD G. SCHREURS · 2017 to 2026
$3.5M
Research Training Program in Behavioral and Biomedical SciencesT32GM132494 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Anne Courtney DeVries, Kevin T Larkin · 2019 to 2026
$2.8M
Adverse Consequences of Light at Night for Cerebral IschemiaR01NS092388 · NINDS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI DEVRIES, ANNE COURTNEY, NELSON, RANDY J. · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
Affective Consequences of ChemotherapyR01CA194924 · NCI · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI DEVRIES, ANNE COURTNEY · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194924NIA NIH HHS T32 AG052375NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM132494NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS092388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCircadian rhythms are important for all aspects of biology; virtually every aspect of biological function varies according to time of day. Although this is well known, variation across the day is also often ignored in the design and reporting of research. For this review, we analyzed the top 50 cited papers across 10 major domains of the biological sciences in the calendar year 2015. We repeated this analysis for the year 2019, hypothesizing that the awarding of a Nobel Prize in 2017 for achievements in the field of circadian biology would highlight the importance of circadian rhythms for scientists across many disciplines, and improve time-of-day reporting.

resultsOur analyses of these 1000 empirical papers, however, revealed that most failed to include sufficient temporal details when describing experimental methods and that few systematic differences in time-of-day reporting existed between 2015 and 2019. Overall, only 6.1% of reports included time-of-day information about experimental measures and manipulations sufficient to permit replication.

conclusionsCircadian rhythms are a defining feature of biological systems, and knowing when in the circadian day these systems are evaluated is fundamentally important information. Failing to account for time of day hampers reproducibility across laboratories, complicates interpretation of results, and reduces the value of data based predominantly on nocturnal animals when extrapolating to diurnal humans.

Indexed as

BiologyCircadian RhythmAnimalsReproducibility of ResultsBehavioral sciencesCardiac and cardiovascular systemsCircadian rhythmsEndocrinology and metabolismImmunologyNeuroscienceOncologyPharmacologyPhysiologyTime of day

Identifiers

PMID35705939
PMCPMC9202143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.