Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35705918›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2022

Estimation of dam line composition of 3-way crossbred animals using genomic information.

Mario P L Calus, John M Henshall, Rachel Hawken, Jérémie Vandenplas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Definition of metafounders based on population structure analysis.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mario P L CalusAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands. mario.calus@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3213-704X
John M HenshallCobb-Vantress Inc., Siloam Springs, AR, 72761-1030, USA.
Rachel HawkenCobb-Vantress Inc., Siloam Springs, AR, 72761-1030, USA.
Jérémie VandenplasAnimal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University & Research, P.O. Box 338, 6700 AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2554-072X

Funding

Ministerie van Economische Zaken Food Project 16022Ministerie van Economische Zaken TKI Agri
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn genomic prediction including data of 3- or 4-way crossbred animals, line composition is usually fitted as a regression on expected line proportions, which are 0.5, 0.25 and 0.25, respectively, for 3-way crossbred animals. However, actual line proportions for the dam lines can vary between  ~ 0.1 and 0.4, and ignoring this variation may affect the genomic estimated breeding values of purebred selection candidates. Our aim was to validate a proposed gold standard to evaluate different approaches for estimating line proportions using simulated data, and to subsequently use this in actual 3-way crossbred broiler data to evaluate several other methods.

resultsAnalysis of simulated data confirmed that line proportions computed from assigned breed-origin-of-alleles (BOA) provide a very accurate gold standard, even if the parental lines are closely related. Alternative investigated methods were linear regression of genotypes on line-specific allele frequencies, maximum likelihood estimation using the program ADMIXTURE, and the genomic relationship of crossbred animals with their maternal grandparents. The results from the simulated data showed that the genomic relationship with the maternal grandparent was most accurate, and least affected by closer relationships between the dam lines. Linear regression and ADMIXTURE performed similarly for unrelated lines, but their accuracy dropped considerably when the dam lines were more closely related. In almost all cases, estimates improved after adjusting them to ensure that the sum of dam line contributions within animals was equal to 0.5, and within dam line and across animals the average was equal to 0.25. Results from the broiler data were much more similar between methods. In both cases, stringent linkage disequilibrium pruning of genotype data led to a relatively low accuracy of predicted line proportions, due to the loss of too many single nucleotide polymorphisms.

conclusionsWith relatively unrelated parental lines as typical in crosses in pigs and poultry, linear regression of crossbred genotypes on line-specific allele frequencies and ADMIXTURE are very competitive methods. Thus, linear regression may be the method of choice, as it does not require genotypes of grandparents, is computationally very efficient, and easily implemented and adapted for considering the specific nature of the crossbred animals analysed.

Indexed as

ChickensModels, GeneticAllelesAnimalsGenomicsGenotypeHybridization, GeneticLinkage DisequilibriumPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSwine

Identifiers

PMID35705918
PMCPMC9199202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.