Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35705694›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Cell type matching in single-cell RNA-sequencing data using FR-Match.

Yun Zhang, Brian Aevermann, Rohan Gala, Richard H Scheuermann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Science advances · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yun ZhangJ. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Brian AevermannJ. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Rohan GalaAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Richard H ScheuermannJ. Craig Venter Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA. rscheuermann@jcvi.org.

Funding

A Community Framework for Data-driven Brain Transcriptomic Cell Type Definition, Ontology, and NomenclatureRF1MH123220 · NIMH · ALLEN INSTITUTE · PI HAWRYLYCZ, MICHAEL, LEIN, ED · 2020 to 2020
$2.8M
NIH HHS 1RF1MH123220NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH123220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reference cell atlases powered by single cell and spatial transcriptomics technologies are becoming available to study healthy and diseased tissue at single cell resolution. One important use of these data resources is to compare cell types from new dataset with cell types in the reference atlases to evaluate their phenotypic similarities and differences, for example, for identifying novel cell types under disease conditions. For this purpose, rigorously-validated computational algorithms are needed to perform these cell type matching tasks that can compare datasets from different experiment platforms and sample types. Here, we present significant enhancements to FR-Match (v2.0)-a multivariate nonparametric statistical testing approach for matching cell types in query datasets to reference atlases. FR-Match v2.0 includes a normalization procedure to facilitate cross-platform cluster-level comparisons (e.g., plate-based SMART-seq and droplet-based 10X Chromium single cell and single nucleus RNA-seq and spatial transcriptomics) and extends the pipeline to also allow cell-level matching. In the use cases evaluated, FR-Match showed robust and accurate performance for identifying common and novel cell types across tissue regions, for discovering sub-optimally clustered cell types, and for cross-platform and cross-sample cell type matching.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Expression ProfilingRNARNA-SeqSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell AnalysisRNA

Identifiers

PMID35705694
PMCPMC9200772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.