Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35705693›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2022

Transmission of antibiotic resistance at the wildlife-livestock interface.

Shinyoung Lee, Peixin Fan, Ting Liu, Anni Yang, Raoul K Boughton, Kim M Pepin, Ryan S Miller, Kwangcheol Casey Jeong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Antimicrobial resistance genes in wild coyotes (One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shinyoung LeeEmerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Peixin FanEmerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Ting LiuEmerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Anni YangDepartment of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9535-2193
Raoul K BoughtonRange Cattle Research and Education Center, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Ona, FL, 33865, USA.
Kim M PepinNational Wildlife Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, 4101 Laporte Ave., Fort Collins, CO, 80521, USA.
Ryan S MillerCenter for Epidemiology and Animal Health, United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, 2150 Center Dr., Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Kwangcheol Casey JeongEmerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA. kcjeong@ufl.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4337-0426

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic-resistant microorganisms (ARMs) are widespread in natural environments, animals (wildlife and livestock), and humans, which has reduced our capacity to control life threatening infectious disease. Yet, little is known about their transmission pathways, especially at the wildlife-livestock interface. This study investigated the potential transmission of ARMs and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) between cattle and wildlife by comparing gut microbiota and ARG profiles of feral swine (Sus scrofa), coyotes (Canis latrans), cattle (Bos taurus), and environmental microbiota. Unexpectedly, wild animals harbored more abundant ARMs and ARGs compared to grazing cattle. Gut microbiota of cattle was significantly more similar to that of feral swine captured within the cattle grazing area where the home range of both species overlapped substantially. In addition, ARMs against medically important antibiotics were more prevalent in wildlife than grazing cattle, suggesting that wildlife could be a source of ARMs colonization in livestock.

Indexed as

Animals, WildLivestockAnimalsCattleDrug Resistance, Microbial

Identifiers

PMID35705693
PMCPMC9200806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.