ArticleCommunications biology2022
Empirical Bayes functional models for hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry.
Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modulating pseudokinase conformation from the ATP-binding site.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2026Article
- Inferring residue level hydrogen deuterium exchange with ReX.Communications chemistry · 2025Article
- HRaDeX: R Package and Web Server for Computing High-Resolution Deuterium Uptake Rates for HDX-MS Data.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Kingfisher: An open-sourced web-based platform for the analysis of hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry data.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Neurofilament Light Chain under the Lens of Structural Mass Spectrometry.ACS chemical neuroscience · 2025Article
- Computational Tools for Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- A Functional Bayesian Model for Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry.Journal of proteome research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) is a technique to explore differential protein structure by examining the rate of deuterium incorporation for specific peptides. This rate will be altered upon structural perturbation and detecting significant changes to this rate requires a statistical test. To determine rates of incorporation, HDX-MS measurements are frequently made over a time course. However, current statistical testing procedures ignore the correlations in the temporal dimension of the data. Using tools from functional data analysis, we develop a testing procedure that explicitly incorporates a model of hydrogen deuterium exchange. To further improve statistical power, we develop an empirical Bayes version of our method, allowing us to borrow information across peptides and stabilise variance estimates for low sample sizes. Our approach has increased power, reduces false positives and improves interpretation over linear model-based approaches. Due to the improved flexibility of our method, we can apply it to a multi-antibody epitope-mapping experiment where current approaches are inapplicable due insufficient flexibility. Hence, our approach allows HDX-MS to be applied in more experimental scenarios and reduces the burden on experimentalists to produce excessive replicates. Our approach is implemented in the R-package "hdxstats": https://github.com/ococrook/hdxstats .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.