ArticleScientific reports2022
Asymmetry between right and left optical coherence tomography images identified using convolutional neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Low Complexity Efficient Deep Learning Model for Automated Retinal Disease Diagnosis.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2025Article
- Exploring Publicly Accessible Optical Coherence Tomography Datasets: A Comprehensive Overview.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Application of deep learning artificial intelligence technique to the classification of clinical orthodontic photos.BMC oral health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In a previous study, we identified biocular asymmetries in fundus photographs, and macula was discriminative area to distinguish left and right fundus images with > 99.9% accuracy. The purposes of this study were to investigate whether optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of the left and right eyes could be discriminated by convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and to support the previous result. We used a total of 129,546 OCT images. CNNs identified right and left horizontal images with high accuracy (99.50%). Even after flipping the left images, all of the CNNs were capable of discriminating them (DenseNet121: 90.33%, ResNet50: 88.20%, VGG19: 92.68%). The classification accuracy results were similar for the right and left flipped images (90.24% vs. 90.33%, respectively; p = 0.756). The CNNs also differentiated right and left vertical images (86.57%). In all cases, the discriminatory ability of the CNNs yielded a significant p value (< 0.001). However, the CNNs could not well-discriminate right horizontal images (50.82%, p = 0.548). There was a significant difference in identification accuracy between right and left horizontal and vertical OCT images and between flipped and non-flipped images. As this could result in bias in machine learning, care should be taken when flipping images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.