Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35705655›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2022

Prevention of lymphocele or seroma after mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Crestani Adrien, Mahiou Katia, Bodet Marie-Lucile, Roosen Alice, Bonneau Claire, Rouzier Roman

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. The Bow-and-arrow Technique for Large-volume Fluid Aspiration.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A comprehensive review of seroma formation, prevention, and treatment approaches.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2025
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Crestani Adrien *Institut Curie, 35, Rue Dailly, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France.
Mahiou Katia *Institut Curie, 35, Rue Dailly, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France.
Bodet Marie-LucileInstitut Curie, 35, Rue Dailly, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France.
Roosen AliceInstitut Curie, 35, Rue Dailly, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France.
Bonneau ClaireInstitut Curie, 35, Rue Dailly, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France.
Rouzier RomanInstitut Curie, 35, Rue Dailly, 92210, Saint-Cloud, France. adriencrestani@hotmail.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-7826-6656
Institut Curie · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seroma or lymphocele remains the most common complication after mastectomy and lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Many different techniques are available to prevent this complication: wound drainage, reduction of the dead space by flap fixation, use of various types of energy, external compression dressings, shoulder immobilization or physical activity, as well as numerous drugs and glues. We searched MEDLINE, clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for publications addressing the issue of prevention of lymphocele or seroma after mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy. Quality was assessed using Hawker's quality assessment tool. Incidence of seroma or lymphocele were collected. Fifteen randomized controlled trials including a total of 1766 patients undergoing radical mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer were retrieved. The incidence of lymphocele or seroma in the study population was 24.2% (411/1698): 25.2% (232/920) in the test groups and 23.0% (179/778) in the control groups. Neither modification of surgical technique (RR 0.86; 95% CI [0.72, 1.03]) nor application of a medical treatment (RR 0.96; 95% CI [0.72, 1.29]) was effective in preventing lymphocele. On the contrary, decreasing the drainage time increased the risk of lymphocele (RR 1.88; 95% CI [1.43, 2.48). There was no publication bias but the studies were of medium to low quality. To conclude, despite the heterogeneity of study designs, drainage appears to be the most effective technique, although the overall quality of the data is low.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymphoceleFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionMastectomyPostoperative ComplicationsSeroma

Identifiers

PMID35705655
PMCPMC9200791
OpenAlexW4282980966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.