ReviewScientific reports2022
Predicting Parkinson disease related genes based on PyFeat and gradient boosted decision tree.
Review in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-Analysis and Topological Perturbation in Interactomic Network for Antiopioid Addiction Drug Repurposing.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Pooled it
- Lactate metabolism-driven tumor heterogeneity and molecular signatures in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Multi-omics comprehensive analysis identified KIF22 and KRAS as highly synthetic lethal pairs for triple-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Cutting-edge AI tools revolutionizing scientific research in life sciences.Biotechnologia · 2025Review
- Prediction of radiation-induced acute skin toxicity in breast cancer patients using data encapsulation screening and dose-gradient-based multi-region radiomics technique: A multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identifying genes related to Parkinson's disease (PD) is an active research topic in biomedical analysis, which plays a critical role in diagnosis and treatment. Recently, many studies have proposed different techniques for predicting disease-related genes. However, a few of these techniques are designed or developed for PD gene prediction. Most of these PD techniques are developed to identify only protein genes and discard long noncoding (lncRNA) genes, which play an essential role in biological processes and the transformation and development of diseases. This paper proposes a novel prediction system to identify protein and lncRNA genes related to PD that can aid in an early diagnosis. First, we preprocessed the genes into DNA FASTA sequences from the University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) genome browser and removed the redundancies. Second, we extracted some significant features of DNA FASTA sequences using the PyFeat method with the AdaBoost as feature selection. These selected features achieved promising results compared with extracted features from some state-of-the-art feature extraction techniques. Finally, the features were fed to the gradient-boosted decision tree (GBDT) to diagnose different tested cases. Seven performance metrics were used to evaluate the performance of the proposed system. The proposed system achieved an average accuracy of 78.6%, the area under the curve equals 84.5%, the area under precision-recall (AUPR) equals 85.3%, F1-score equals 78.3%, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) equals 0.575, sensitivity (SEN) equals 77.1%, and specificity (SPC) equals 80.2%. The experiments demonstrate promising results compared with other systems. The predicted top-rank protein and lncRNA genes are verified based on a literature review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.