Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35705596›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Mobile phones are hazardous microbial platforms warranting robust public health and biosecurity protocols.

Matthew Olsen, Rania Nassar, Abiola Senok, Susan Moloney, Anna Lohning, Peter Jones, Gary Grant, Mark Morgan, Dinesh Palipana, Simon McKirdy and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Matthew OlsenFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Genomics and Molecular Biology, Bond University, Robina, Gold Coast, QLD, 4229, Australia.
Rania NassarMohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, UAE.
Abiola SenokMohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, UAE.
Susan MoloneyFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Genomics and Molecular Biology, Bond University, Robina, Gold Coast, QLD, 4229, Australia.
Anna LohningFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Genomics and Molecular Biology, Bond University, Robina, Gold Coast, QLD, 4229, Australia.
Peter JonesFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Genomics and Molecular Biology, Bond University, Robina, Gold Coast, QLD, 4229, Australia.
Gary GrantSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Mark MorganFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Genomics and Molecular Biology, Bond University, Robina, Gold Coast, QLD, 4229, Australia.
Dinesh PalipanaSchool of Medicine Gold Coast, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Simon McKirdyHarry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, 6150, Australia.
Rashed AlghafriFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Genomics and Molecular Biology, Bond University, Robina, Gold Coast, QLD, 4229, Australia.
Lotti TajouriFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Genomics and Molecular Biology, Bond University, Robina, Gold Coast, QLD, 4229, Australia. ltajouri@bond.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in technology and communication have revolutionised the twenty-first century with the introduction of mobile phones and smartphones. These phones are known to be platforms harbouring microbes with recent research shedding light on the abundance and broad spectrum of organisms they harbour. Mobile phone use in the community and in professional sectors including health care settings is a potential source of microbial dissemination. To identify the diversity of microbial genetic signature present on mobile phones owned by hospital medical staff. Twenty-six mobile phones of health care staff were swabbed. DNA extraction for downstream next generation sequencing shotgun metagenomic microbial profiling was performed. Survey questionnaires were handed to the staff to collect information on mobile phone usage and users' behaviours. Each of the 26 mobile phones of this study was contaminated with microbes with the detection of antibiotic resistance and virulent factors. Taken together the sum of microbes and genes added together across all 26 mobile phones totalised 11,163 organisms (5714 bacteria, 675 fungi, 93 protists, 228 viruses, 4453 bacteriophages) and 2096 genes coding for antibiotic resistance and virulent factors. The survey of medical staff showed that 46% (12/26) of the participants used their mobile phones in the bathroom. Mobile phones are vectors of microbes and can contribute to microbial dissemination and nosocomial diseases worldwide. As fomites, mobile phones that are not decontaminated may pose serious risks for public health and biosecurity.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneCross InfectionBiosecurityFomitesHumansPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID35705596
PMCPMC9199474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.