Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35705586›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A new method to quantify left ventricular mass by 2D echocardiography.

Charlotte Burup Kristensen, Katrine Aagaard Myhr, Frederik Fasth Grund, Niels Vejlstrup, Christian Hassager, Raj Mattu, Rasmus Mogelvang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlotte Burup KristensenDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet - University hospital of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. charlotte.burup.kristensen@regionh.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-8308-8997
Katrine Aagaard MyhrDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet - University hospital of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frederik Fasth GrundDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet - University hospital of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels VejlstrupDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet - University hospital of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christian HassagerDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet - University hospital of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Raj MattuKettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Kettering, NN16 8UZ, Northants, UK.
Rasmus MogelvangDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Center, Rigshospitalet - University hospital of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKKettering General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased left ventricular mass (LVM) is a strong independent predictor for adverse cardiovascular events, but conventional echocardiographic methods are limited by poor reproducibility and accuracy. We developed a novel method based on adding the mean wall thickness from the parasternal short axis view, to the left ventricular end-diastolic volume acquired using the biplane model of discs. The participants (n = 85) had various left ventricular geometries and were assessed using echocardiography followed immediately by cardiac magnetic resonance, as reference. We compared our novel two-dimensional (2D) method to various conventional one-dimensional (1D) and other 2D methods as well as the three-dimensional (3D) method. Our novel method had better reproducibility in intra-examiner [coefficients of variation (CV) 9% vs. 11-14%] and inter-examiner analysis (CV 9% vs. 10-20%). Accuracy was similar to the 3D method (mean difference ± 95% limits of agreement, CV): Novel: 2 ± 50 g, 15% vs. 3D: 2 ± 51 g, 16%; and better than the "linear" 1D method by Devereux (7 ± 76 g, 23%). Our novel method is simple, has considerable better reproducibility and accuracy than conventional "linear" 1D methods, and similar accuracy as the 3D-method. As the biplane model forms part of the standard echocardiographic protocol, it does not require specific training and provides a supplement to the modern echocardiographic report.

Indexed as

Echocardiography, Three-DimensionalEchocardiographyHeart VentriclesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID35705586
PMCPMC9200734
OpenAlexW4282916682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.