Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35705578›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Risk factors associated with the infection of sheep with Dichelobacter nodosus.

Julia Storms, Anna Wirth, Danae Vasiliadis, Jörg Jores, Peter Kuhnert, Ottmar Distl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia StormsInstitute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Anna WirthInstitute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Danae VasiliadisInstitute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559, Hannover, Germany.
Jörg JoresInstitute of Veterinary Bacteriology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Peter KuhnertInstitute of Veterinary Bacteriology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Ottmar DistlInstitute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559, Hannover, Germany. ottmar.distl@tiho-hannover.de.
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DEUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovine footrot is a highly contagious foot disease caused by the gram-negative bacterium Dichelobacter nodosus (D. nodosus). In a recent report, we showed a prevalence of 42.9% D. nodosus positive swabs across Germany. In this follow-up study, we used real-time PCR results for D. nodosus and footrot scores of 9297 sheep from 208 flocks and collated these data with survey data on herd and animal characteristics and herd management. The aims of the present study were to investigate herd and animal factors associated with D. nodosus infection and footrot scores in individual sheep. Multivariable analyses with generalized mixed models showed that month of recording, breed, herdbook membership, use of antibiotics, and footbaths in the past 3-10 years, signs of footrot in the past 12 months and flock environment of the sheep, modelled as a random farm effect within region, were significant risk factors. Among the 21 different breeds, Romney had the lowest risk of D. nodosus infection, while Swifter had the highest risk and German Merino and German White Heath were the next breeds at highest risk of D. nodosus infection. The variance between farms in the prevalence of D. nodosus was large and accounted for 84% of the total variance in the mixed model analysis. We conclude that specific and as yet unknown effects influencing D. nodosus infections in flocks, as well as breed and weather, are the most important effects on D. nodosus infection in sheep, pointing towards the need to establish adequate infection control at farm level.

Indexed as

Dichelobacter nodosusFoot RotGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsSheep DiseasesAnimalsFollow-Up StudiesRisk FactorsSheepSheep, Domestic

Identifiers

PMID35705578
PMCPMC9200780
OpenAlexW4282979956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.