Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35705494›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Lessons from the Stories of Women in Neuroscience.

Leslie J Sibener, Megan A Kirchgessner, Sheila Steiner, Chiaki Santiago, Daniela Cassataro, Marley Rossa, Caterina P Profaci, Nancy Padilla-Coreano

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Editorial: Women in sensory neuroscience 2023.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Leslie J SibenerDepartment of Neuroscience and Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027.
Megan A KirchgessnerNew York University School of Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, New York, New York 10016.
Sheila SteinerNeurobiology Section, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92037.
Chiaki SantiagoNeurobiology Section, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92037.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8226-7117
Daniela CassataroNeurobiology Section, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92037.
Marley RossaNeurobiology Section, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92037.
Caterina P ProfaciDepartments of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92037.
Nancy Padilla-CoreanoDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610 npadillacoreano@ufl.edu.
University of California San Diego · USSalk Institute for Biological Studies · USAllen Institute for Brain Science · USNeurosciences Institute · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Neurosciences Graduate Training ProgramT32NS061847 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Brenda L Bloodgood · 2008 to 2026
$7.7M
Blood Cells in Hemostasis and ThrombosisT32HL086344 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GINSBERG, MARK HOWARD · 2008 to 2023
$4.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL086344NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS061847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women have been contributing to the field of neuroscience since its inception, but their accomplishments are often overlooked. Lack of recognition, among other issues, has led to progressively fewer women at each academic stage; although half of neuroscience graduate students are women, women comprise less than one-third of neuroscience faculty, and even fewer full professors. Those who reach this level continue to struggle to get their work recognized. Women from historically excluded backgrounds are even more starkly underrepresented and face added challenges related to racial, ethnic, and other biases. To increase the visibility of women in neuroscience, promote their voices, and learn about their career journeys, we created Stories of Women in Neuroscience (Stories of WiN). Stories of WiN shares the scientific and personal stories of women neuroscientists with diverse backgrounds, identities, research interests, and at various career stages. From >70 women highlighted thus far, a major theme has emerged: there is not a single archetype of a woman neuroscientist, nor a single path to "success." Yet, through these diverse experiences run common threads, such as the importance of positive early research experiences, managing imposter syndrome, the necessity of work-life balance, and the challenges of fitting into-or resisting-the "scientist mold" within a patriarchal, racialized academic system. These commonalities reveal important considerations for supporting women neuroscientists. Through the lens of women highlighted by Stories of WiN, we explore the similarities among their journeys and detail specific actionable items to help encourage, support, and sustain women in neuroscience.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersNeurosciencesEthnicityFemaleHumansRacial GroupsSelf Concept

Identifiers

PMID35705494
PMCPMC9188381
OpenAlexW4283019222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.