Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35705361›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2022

Principles and methods of global legal epidemiology.

Mathieu J P Poirier, A M Viens, Tarra L Penney, Susan Rogers Van Katwyk, Chloe C Astbury, Gigi Lin, Tina Nanyangwe-Moyo, Steven J Hoffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The contribution ofBJPsych open · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mathieu J P PoirierGlobal Strategy Lab, Dahdaleh Institute for Global Health Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3842-0011
A M ViensGlobal Strategy Lab, Dahdaleh Institute for Global Health Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2379-4523
Tarra L PenneyGlobal Strategy Lab, Dahdaleh Institute for Global Health Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4889-9102
Susan Rogers Van KatwykGlobal Strategy Lab, Dahdaleh Institute for Global Health Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1758-8635
Chloe C AstburyGlobal Strategy Lab, Dahdaleh Institute for Global Health Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2955-7833
Gigi LinGlobal Strategy Lab, Dahdaleh Institute for Global Health Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8402-4418
Tina Nanyangwe-MoyoGlobal Strategy Lab, Dahdaleh Institute for Global Health Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9175-323X
Steven J HoffmanGlobal Strategy Lab, Dahdaleh Institute for Global Health Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada steven.hoffman@globalstrategylab.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2064-3711

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the theory and methods of legal epidemiology-the scientific study and deployment of law as a factor in the cause, distribution, and prevention of disease and injury in a population-have been well developed in the context of domestic law, the challenges posed by shifting the frame of analysis to the global legal space have not yet been fully explored. While legal epidemiology rests on the foundational principles that law acts as an intervention, that law can be an object of scientific study and that law has impacts that should be evaluated, its application to the global level requires the recognition that international laws, policies and norms can cause effects independently from their legal implementation within countries. The global legal space blurs distinctions between 'hard' and 'soft' law, often operating through pathways of global agenda setting, legal language, political pressures, social mobilisation and trade pressures to have direct impacts on people, places and products. Despite these complexities, international law has been overwhelmingly studied as operating solely through national policy change, with only one global quasi-experimental evaluation of an international law's impact on health published to date. To promote greater adoption of global legal epidemiology, we expand on an existing typology of public health law studies with examples of policymaking, mapping, implementation, intervention and mechanism studies. Global legal epidemiology holds great promise as a way to produce rigorous and impactful research on the international laws, policies and norms that shape our collective health, equity and well-being.

Indexed as

epidemiologyinternational healthmethodspolicyresearch design

Identifiers

PMID35705361
PMCPMC9380495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.