Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35705343›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Use of

Anna Winther Mogensen, Lars J Petersen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Mette Nørgaard, Marie T Pank, Helle D Zacho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A randomised trial of [BJUI compass · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anna Winther MogensenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark anna.w@rn.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-1742-9749
Lars J PetersenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Christian Torp-PedersenDepartment of Clinical Research, North Zealand Hospital, Hillerod, Denmark.
Mette NørgaardDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6110-5891
Marie T PankDepartment of Urology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Helle D ZachoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9089-288X
Aalborg University Hospital · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKZealand University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether preoperative staging of high-risk prostate cancer with

designNationwide, population-based cohort study using real-world data.

settingThe study used national health registries, including all sites in Denmark from 2011 to 2018.

participantsNewly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from 2011 to 2018. Patients were stratified into two groups according to the preoperative imaging modality of either

main outcome measuresThe risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) as a proxy for skeletal metastases following radical prostatectomy. The secondary endpoint was overall survival.

resultsBetween 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2018, 4183 high-risk patients underwent radical prostatectomy. Of these patients, 807 (19.3%) underwent

conclusionPatients with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing preoperative staging with

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFluorine RadioisotopesHumansMalePositron-Emission TomographySodium FluorideFluorine RadioisotopesSodium Fluorideepidemiologynuclear medicineoncologyurological tumours

Identifiers

PMID35705343
PMCPMC9204404
OpenAlexW4282928289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.