Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35704975›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2022

De-escalating adjuvant durvalumab treatment duration in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Alex K Bryant, Kamya Sankar, Lili Zhao, Garth W Strohbehn, David Elliott, Drew Moghanaki, Michael J Kelley, Nithya Ramnath, Michael D Green

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Revisiting nature of stage III non-small cell lung cancer: Anatomically defined, biologically systemic.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alex K BryantDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kamya SankarDivision of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Section of Hematology Oncology, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Lili ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Garth W StrohbehnRogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Section of Hematology Oncology, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
David ElliottDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Drew MoghanakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, VA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; UCLA Jonsson Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Michael J KelleyDivision of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; VA Medical Center in Durham, Durham, NC, USA.
Nithya RamnathDivision of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Section of Hematology Oncology, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: nithyar@med.umich.edu.
Michael D GreenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: migr@med.umich.edu.
University of Michigan · USDuke University · USVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System · US

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Ablating Liver Metastases with SBRT to Enhance Immune Checkpoint Blockade in MelanomaR01CA276217 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI THEODORE S LAWRENCE · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
Targeting BUB 1 for radio- and immuno-sensitization of Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)R21CA252010 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GREEN, MICHAEL DANIEL, NYATI, SHYAM · 2021 to 2021
$401k
BLRD VA I01 BX005267NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS R01 CA276217NCI NIH HHS R21 CA252010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne year of adjuvant durvalumab following concurrent chemoradiotherapy significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal length of adjuvant therapy has not been determined.

methodsWe identified patients with stage III NSCLC treated with definitive chemoradiation and adjuvant durvalumab from November 2017 to April 2021 from the United States Veterans Affairs system. Predictors of early durvalumab discontinuation were evaluated with Cox proportional hazards regression. The effect of differing durations of durvalumab treatment (up to 6, 9, and 12 months) on PFS and OS were compared with a marginal structural model and time-dependent Cox modelling.

resultsWe included 1006 patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy and at least one dose of adjuvant durvalumab. The median duration of durvalumab treatment was 7 months (interquartile range 2.8-11.5) and 31% completed the intended durvalumab course. The most common reasons for early discontinuation were tumour progression (22%), immune-related adverse events (15%), and non-immune-related toxicity (6.0%), Marginal structural models suggested similar PFS for 9 months versus 12 months of durvalumab treatment and inferior PFS for 6 months versus 12 months.

conclusionsA substantial proportion of patients undergoing adjuvant durvalumab discontinue therapy early due to toxicity, and shorter durvalumab treatment durations may provide similar disease control to 12 months of therapy. Prospective randomised controlled studies are needed to characterise the optimal durvalumab treatment duration in locally advanced NSCLC patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalChemoradiotherapyDuration of TherapyHumansNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesAntibodies, MonoclonaldurvalumabDe-escalationDurvalumabImmunotherapyMarginal structural modellingNon-small cell lung cancerTreatment duration

Identifiers

PMID35704975
PMCPMC10508975
OpenAlexW4281755541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.