ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2022
Comparison of the effectiveness of two combinations of antibiotic used for perioperative prophylactic therapy during radical cystectomy: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06770530 (IMPACT - the Introduction of Mycotic Prophylaxis At Cystectomy Trial. Perioperative Mycotic Prophylaxis to Reduce Postoperative Complications Following Cystectomy - a Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
IMPACT - the Introduction of Mycotic Prophylaxis At Cystectomy Trial. Perioperative Mycotic Prophylaxis to Reduce Postoperative Complications Following Cystectomy - a Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis retrospective cohort study aimed to compare primary and secondary outcomes of patients undergoing radical cystectomy according to two different perioperative antimicrobial therapy protocols in 2016.
methodsIn this single-center, retrospective cohort study, we investigated data of 104 patients undergoing radical cystectomy due to bladder cancer from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016. According to perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, patients were divided into two groups: 48 patients received piperacillin/tazobactam 3x4.5 g intravenously (IV) combined with metronidazole 3x500 mg IV, and 56 patients received ceftriaxone 1x2 g IV combined with metronidazole 3x500 mg IV. All patients received the first dose of antibiotics 24 hours prior to the operative procedure, and it continued over the next 48 hours after the procedure. We analyzed and compared data from various primary and secondary outcomes for both groups of patients.
resultsIn the group of patients receiving the combination of the piperacillin/tazobactam with metronidazole, the length of postoperative hospitalization was shorter (14 vs. 16 days, Z=2.24957 p=0.02383), leukocyte blood count on the first postoperative day was lower (9.80 vs. 11.15, p=0.01384), and hospital-acquired pneumonia was less common (2.08% vs. 12.5%, p=0.04688) than in the group receiving a combination of ceftriaxone and metronidazole.
conclusionsIn radical cystectomy, perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis protocol using piperacillin/tazobactam combined with metronidazole proved to be more effective than the combination of ceftriaxone with metronidazole.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.