Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35704762›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Anti-bat ultrasound production in moths is globally and phylogenetically widespread.

Jesse R Barber, David Plotkin, Juliette J Rubin, Nicholas T Homziak, Brian C Leavell, Peter R Houlihan, Krystie A Miner, Jesse W Breinholt, Brandt Quirk-Royal, Pablo Sebastián Padrón and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Is it a bat or a male? A female moth (Syntomeida epilais, Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Arctiinae) adapts its acoustic signals for defense or courtship.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Anti-bat ultrasound production in moths is globally and phylogenetically widespread.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jesse R BarberDepartment of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725.ORCID 0000-0003-3084-2973
David PlotkinMcGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.ORCID 0000-0002-2339-655X
Juliette J RubinMcGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.
Nicholas T HomziakMcGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.
Brian C LeavellDepartment of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725.ORCID 0000-0003-4443-9309
Peter R HoulihanMcGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.ORCID 0000-0002-5743-3718
Krystie A MinerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725.ORCID 0000-0001-8968-7969
Jesse W BreinholtMcGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.
Brandt Quirk-RoyalDepartment of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725.
Pablo Sebastián PadrónMcGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.ORCID 0000-0001-9104-1657
Matias NunezConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Patagonia Norte, Ingeniero White, 8400, Argentina.
Akito Y KawaharaMcGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.ORCID 0000-0002-3724-4610
Florida Museum of Natural History · USBoise State University · USBariloche Atomic Centre · ARIntermountain Healthcare · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Warning signals are well known in the visual system, but rare in other modalities. Some moths produce ultrasonic sounds to warn bats of noxious taste or to mimic unpalatable models. Here, we report results from a long-term study across the globe, assaying moth response to playback of bat echolocation. We tested 252 genera, spanning most families of large-bodied moths, and document anti-bat ultrasound production in 52 genera, with eight subfamily origins described. Based on acoustic analysis of ultrasonic emissions and palatability experiments with bats, it seems that acoustic warning and mimicry are the raison d'être for sound production in most moths. However, some moths use high-duty-cycle ultrasound capable of jamming bat sonar. In fact, we find preliminary evidence of independent origins of sonar jamming in at least six subfamilies. Palatability data indicate that jamming and warning are not mutually exclusive strategies. To explore the possible organization of anti-bat warning sounds into acoustic mimicry rings, we intensively studied a community of moths in Ecuador and, using machine-learning approaches, found five distinct acoustic clusters. While these data represent an early understanding of acoustic aposematism and mimicry across this megadiverse insect order, it is likely that ultrasonically signaling moths comprise one of the largest mimicry complexes on earth.

Indexed as

Biological MimicryEcholocationEscape ReactionMothsAcousticsAnimalsChiropteraPhylogenyPredatory BehaviorPyridinesUltrasonicsECU-01 cpdPyridinesacoustic mimicryantipredator defensebiodiversity

Identifiers

PMID35704762
PMCPMC9231501
OpenAlexW4282942736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.