SynthesisPloS one2022
The mental health and wellbeing of spouses, partners and children of emergency responders: A systematic review.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the experiences, views, and needs of family members of emergency response workers: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of occupational stress on healthcare workers' family members before and during COVID-19: A systematic review.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Using the double diamond framework to co-create and evaluate '1TeamActive': A physical activity and well-being intervention for police workers and their families.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2026Article
- Preliminary Investigation of the Impact of Stress Suppression Processes and Counseling Strategies for Police Officers: A Qualitative Content Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Lifestyle Dimensions of Public Safety Personnel Families: There's No Life Like It.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2025Review
- How Divorce and Parental Loss Shape Children's Moral Growth and Emotional Resilience.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Quality of Professional Life and Empathy of Healthcare Workers in an Emergency Department of General Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Exploring the Occupational Lifestyle Experiences of the Families of Public Safety Personnel.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2024Review
- A qualitative exploration of the views of paramedics regarding the use of dark humour.British paramedic journal · 2024Article
- Experiences and actions of part-time firefighters' family members: a critical incident study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- The recovery processes among paramedics who encountered violence during work-a narrative interview study.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2024Article
- PSPNET Families Wellbeing Hub: A preliminary evaluation of online upstream supports for public safety personnel families.Journal of military, veteran and family health · 2024Article
- Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Tailored to Spouses and Significant Others of Public Safety Personnel: Formative Evaluation Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Turning to 'Trusted Others': A Narrative Review of Providing Social Support to First Responders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergency responders (ERs), often termed First Responders, such as police, fire and paramedic roles are exposed to occupational stressors including high workload, and exposure to trauma from critical incidents, both of which can affect their mental health and wellbeing. Little is known about the impact of the ER occupation on the mental health and wellbeing of their families. The aim of the current study was to investigate what mental health and wellbeing outcomes and experiences have been researched internationally in ER families, and to examine the prevalence and associated risk and protective factors of these outcomes. We conducted a systematic review in accordance with an a priori PROSPERO approved protocol (PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019134974). Forty-three studies were identified for inclusion. The majority of studies used a quantitative, cross-sectional design and were conducted in the United States; just over half assessed police/law enforcement families. Themes of topics investigated included: 1) Spousal/partner mental health and wellbeing; 2) Couple relationships; 3) Child mental health and wellbeing; 4) Family support and coping strategies; and 5) Positive outcomes. The review identified limited evidence regarding the prevalence of mental health and wellbeing outcomes. Family experiences and risk factors described were ER work-stress spillover negatively impacting spousal/partner wellbeing, couple relationships, and domestic violence. Traumatic exposure risk factors included concerns family had for the safety of their ER partner, the negative impact of an ER partners' mental health problem on the couples' communication and on family mental health outcomes. Protective factors included social support; however, a lack of organisational support for families was reported in some studies. Study limitations and future research needs are discussed. Progressing this area of research is important to improve knowledge of baseline needs of ER families to be able to target interventions, improve public health, and support ER's operational effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.