Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35704616›Full record

Trial reportAge and ageing2022

Stimulation of the tibial nerve-a randomised trial for urinary problems associated with Parkinson's-the STARTUP trial.

Doreen McClurg, Andrew Elders, Suzanne Hagen, Helen Mason, Jo Booth, Anne-Louise Cunnington, Richard Walker, Katherine Deane, Danielle Harari, Jalesh Panicker and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Age and ageing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Doreen McClurgNMAHP RU, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Andrew EldersNMAHP RU, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Suzanne HagenNMAHP RU, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Helen MasonYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Jo BoothScholl of Health & Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Anne-Louise CunningtonThe New Stobhill Hospital - NHSGGC, G21 3UW.
Richard WalkerNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, NE25 0QJ.
Katherine DeaneSchool of Nursing Sciences, University of East Anglia, NR4 7TJ, Norwich.
Danielle HarariGuy's & St Thomas Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, SE1 7EH, London.
Jalesh PanickerUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, WC1E 6BT, London.
Susan StrattonNMAHP RU, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Jaclyn McArthurYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Ceri SellersNMAHP RU, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Marissa CollinsYunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK.
Glasgow Caledonian University · GBNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GBStobhill Hospital · GBSt. Thomas Hospital · CAUniversity College London · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundnon-motor symptoms such as bladder dysfunction are common (80%) in people with Parkinson's increasing the risk for falls with a negative impact on health-related costs and quality of life.We undertook STARTUP to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of using an adhesive electrode to stimulate the transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) to treat bladder dysfunction in people with Parkinson's disease (PD).Study design, materials and methods: STARTUP was a parallel two-arm, multi-centre, pragmatic, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Each participant attended one clinic visit to complete consent, be randomised using a computer-generated system and to be shown how to use the device.The trial had two co-primary outcome measures: International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). These were completed at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks. A bladder frequency chart and resource questionnaire were also completed.

resultstwo hundred forty two participants were randomised. About 59% of participants were male, the mean age was 69 years and mean time since diagnosis was 6 years. Questionnaire return rate was between 79 and 90%.There was a statistically significantly lower score in the active group at 6 weeks in the IPSS questionnaire (mean difference (Standard deviation, SD) 12.5 (6.5) vs 10.9 (5.5), effect size -1.49, 95% CI -2.72, -0.25). There was no statistically significant change in any other outcome.

conclusionTTNS was demonstrated to be safe with a high level of compliance. There was a significant change in one of the co-primary outcome measures at the end of the treatment period (i.e. 6 weeks), which could indicate a benefit. Further fully powered RCTs are required to determine effective treatments.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationUrinary IncontinenceAgedFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTibial NerveTreatment Outcomebladder dysfunctionneurologyneuromodulationolder peopleParkinson’s

Identifiers

PMID35704616
PMCPMC9200143
OpenAlexW4282980750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.