ArticleScience advances2022
The intersectional privilege of white able-bodied heterosexual men in STEM.
Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Improving research and development of wearable assistive and rehabilitation technologies: a systematic review on diversity factors.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Crowd Evaluations of Entrepreneurs with Physical Disabilities: Stereotype Subtyping through the Lens of Benevolent Ableism.Entrepreneurship theory and practice · 2026Article
- Devaluation underlies gendered US faculty departures across disciplines and institutions.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- LGBTQ+ Realities in the Biological Sciences.CBE life sciences education · 2026Article
- Building a diverse and inclusive plant science community.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Article
- "Academia Is a Very Unforgiving Space": A Qualitative Study of Challenges Faced by Under-represented Scholars in Biomedical Research.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating perceptions of STEM majors to explain diversity gaps in entomology and other sciences.Annals of the Entomological Society of America · 2026Article
- Health professional students' perspectives on diversity and inclusion in anatomy curricula.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Understanding the Lived Experiences of the members of the Society for the Advancement of Biology Education Research through Collins' Matrix of Domination Framework.CBE life sciences education · 2025Article
- The gender gap in scholarly self-promotion on social media.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Enhancing rigor and justice in genetic counseling research with reflexivity and positionality.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Supporting social justice through equity-based actions for a sustainable future in animal genetics (at the 39th International Society for Animal Genetics Conference).Animal genetics · 2025Article
- Centering voices of scientists from marginalized backgrounds to understand experiences in climate adaptation science and inform action.PloS one · 2025Article
- Queer voices in computational biology: the first ISCB LGBTQI+ Symposium.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Terminology in ecology and evolutionary biology disproportionately harms marginalized groups.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Invisible lines of inequality: intersections of gender, motherhood, and work-based discrimination in Bulgaria.Frontiers in sociology · 2025Article
- Collective dynamics behind success.Nature communications · 2024Review
- How do Students' Science, Social, and Personal Identities Influence their Experiences in Undergraduate Field Biology Courses?CBE life sciences education · 2024Article
- Integrating open education practices with data analysis of open science in an undergraduate course.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Gender Typicality and Engineering Attachment: Examining the Viewpoints of Women College Engineers and Variation by Race/Ethnicity.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
A foundational assumption of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) inequality research is that members of the most well represented demographic group-white able-bodied heterosexual men (WAHM)-are uniquely privileged in STEM. But is this really the case? Using survey data of U.S. STEM professionals (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.