Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35704344›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2022

Anterior nucleus of the thalamus deep brain stimulation vs temporal lobe responsive neurostimulation for temporal lobe epilepsy.

Jimmy C Yang, Katie L Bullinger, Adam S Dickey, Ioannis Karakis, Abdulrahman Alwaki, Brian T Cabaniss, Daniel Winkel, Andres Rodriguez-Ruiz, Jon T Willie, Robert E Gross

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neurostimulation in children with drug-resistant epilepsy: strategies in subcortical targeting and systematic review of the evidence.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Therapeutic approaches targeting seizure networks.Frontiers in network physiology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jimmy C YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1995-5926
Katie L BullingerDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2519-7108
Adam S DickeyDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4710-1290
Ioannis KarakisDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5122-7211
Abdulrahman AlwakiDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Brian T CabanissDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Daniel WinkelDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Andres Rodriguez-RuizDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jon T WillieDepartments of Neurosurgery, Neurology, and Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9565-4338
Robert E GrossDepartment of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1847-9227
Emory University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002381 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY M BLUMBERG, Anandi Nayan Sheth · 2017 to 2026
$14.1M
Neuro HPA Project 1U54AG062334 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Ighovwerha Ofotokun · 2018 to 2026
$12.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002381NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NIA NIH HHS U54 AG062334
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBased on the promising results of randomized controlled trials, deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) are used increasingly in the treatment of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is an indication for either DBS of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) or temporal lobe (TL) RNS, but there are no studies that directly compare the seizure benefits and adverse effects associated with these therapies in this patient population. We, therefore, examined all patients who underwent ANT-DBS or TL-RNS for drug-resistant TLE at our center.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients who were treated with either ANT-DBS or TL-RNS for drug-resistant TLE with at least 12 months of follow-up. Along with the clinical characteristics of each patient's epilepsy, seizure frequency was recorded throughout each patient's postoperative clinical course.

resultsTwenty-six patients underwent ANT-DBS implantation and 32 patients underwent TL-RNS for drug-resistant TLE. The epilepsy characteristics of both groups were similar. Patients who underwent ANT-DBS demonstrated a median seizure reduction of 58% at 12-15 months, compared to a median seizure reduction of 70% at 12-15 months in patients treated with TL-RNS (p > .05). The responder rate (percentage of patients with a 50% decrease or more in seizure frequency) was 54% for ANT-DBS and 56% for TL-RNS (p > .05). The incidence of complications and stimulation-related side effects did not significantly differ between therapies. SIGNIFICANCE: We demonstrate in our single-center experience that patients with drug-resistant TLE benefit similarly from either ANT-DBS or TL-RNS. Selection of either ANT-DBS or TL-RNS may, therefore, depend more heavily on patient and provider preference, as each has unique capabilities and configurations. Future studies will consider subgroup analyses to determine if specific patients have greater seizure frequency reduction from one form of neuromodulation strategy over another.

Indexed as

Anterior Thalamic NucleiDeep Brain StimulationDrug Resistant EpilepsyEpilepsyEpilepsy, Temporal LobeHumansSeizuresTemporal LobeTreatment Outcomedeep brain stimulationepilepsyneuromodulationresponsive neurostimulation

Identifiers

PMID35704344
PMCPMC9675907
OpenAlexW4282962429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.