Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35704257›Full record

ArticleInfection2023

The role of pets in SARS-CoV-2 transmission: an exploratory analysis.

Ana Izabel Passarella Teixeira, Raíssa Nogueira de Brito, Carolina Carvalho Gontijo, Gustavo Adolfo Sierra Romero, Walter Massa Ramalho, Rodrigo Haddad, Elza Ferreira Noronha, Wildo Navegantes de Araújo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ana Izabel Passarella Teixeira *Núcleo de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de Brasília - Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brazil. ana.teixeira@unb.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9208-4288
Raíssa Nogueira de Brito *Núcleo de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de Brasília - Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5981-8139
Carolina Carvalho Gontijo *Núcleo de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de Brasília - Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8021-5081
Gustavo Adolfo Sierra RomeroNúcleo de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de Brasília - Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1425-926X
Walter Massa RamalhoNúcleo de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de Brasília - Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5085-5670
Rodrigo HaddadNúcleo de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de Brasília - Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4699-164X
Elza Ferreira NoronhaNúcleo de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de Brasília - Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4558-3214
Wildo Navegantes de AraújoNúcleo de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de Brasília - Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, DF, 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6856-4094
Universidade de Brasília · BR

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal 00193-00000495/2020-72Ministério da Educação 23106.028855/2020-74
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is evidence that humans can transmit SARS-CoV-2 to cats and dogs. However, there is no evidence that they can transmit it back to humans or play any role in SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Here, we present an exploratory analysis on that matter.

methodsWe conducted a case-control study with participants with flu-like symptoms seeking care at a primary healthcare unit to be tested for COVID-19. They were asked if they owned pet cats and/or dogs in their residences, and this variable was evaluated as exposure.

resultsThe odds ratio of "having dogs and/or cats in the residence" was 1.29 (95% CI 1.08-1.54) of "having only dogs and no cats" was 1.26 (1.05-1.52), and "no dogs and only cats" was 1.29 (0.95-1.75).

conclusionHaving a cat/dog in the house can affect the risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesCOVID-19AnimalsCase-Control StudiesCatsHumansPetsSARS-CoV-2CatCOVID-19DogPetSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35704257
PMCPMC9198608
OpenAlexW4282915273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.