Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35704242›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2022

Phylogenomics of the Phylum Proteobacteria: Resolving the Complex Relationships.

Vaibhav Sharma, Amit Vashishtha, Arsha Liz M Jos, Akshita Khosla, Nirmegh Basu, Rishabh Yadav, Amit Bhatt, Akshanshi Gulani, Pushpa Singh, Sanidhya Lakhera and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Microbial Consortium ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Impact ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Responses of soil biochemical properties andFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vaibhav Sharma *Sri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, Benito Juarez Road, Dhaula Kuan, New Delhi, Delhi, 110021, India.
Amit Vashishtha *Sri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, Benito Juarez Road, Dhaula Kuan, New Delhi, Delhi, 110021, India.
Arsha Liz M JosSri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, Benito Juarez Road, Dhaula Kuan, New Delhi, Delhi, 110021, India.
Akshita KhoslaSri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, Benito Juarez Road, Dhaula Kuan, New Delhi, Delhi, 110021, India.
Nirmegh BasuSri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, Benito Juarez Road, Dhaula Kuan, New Delhi, Delhi, 110021, India.
Rishabh YadavSri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, Benito Juarez Road, Dhaula Kuan, New Delhi, Delhi, 110021, India.
Amit BhattSri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, Benito Juarez Road, Dhaula Kuan, New Delhi, Delhi, 110021, India.
Akshanshi GulaniSri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, Benito Juarez Road, Dhaula Kuan, New Delhi, Delhi, 110021, India.
Pushpa SinghSwami Shraddhanand College, University of Delhi, Alipur, New Delhi, Delhi, 110036, India.
Sanidhya LakheraSri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, Benito Juarez Road, Dhaula Kuan, New Delhi, Delhi, 110021, India.
Mansi VermaSri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, Benito Juarez Road, Dhaula Kuan, New Delhi, Delhi, 110021, India. mansiverma20@gmail.com.
University of Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteobacteria is one of the largest and phenotypically most diverse divisions within the domain bacteria. Due to the economic importance, this phylum demands an urgent need for a clear and scientifically sound classification system to streamline their characterization. The goal of our study was to carefully reevaluate the current system of classification and suggest changes wherein necessary. Phylogenetic trees of 84 Proteobacteria were constructed using single gene-based phylogeny involving 16S rRNA genes and protein sequences of 85 conserved genes, whole genome-based phylogenetic tree using CVtree3.0, amino acid Identity matrix tree, and concatenated tree with aforementioned conserved genes. The results of our study confirm the polyphyletic relationship between Desulfurella acetivorans, a Deltaproteobacteria with Epsilonproteobacteria. The group Syntrophobacterales was found to be polyphyletic with respect to Desulfarculus baarsii and the group Thiotrichales was found to be splitting in different phylogenetic trees. Placement of phylogenetic groups belonging to Rhodocyclales, Oceonospirilalles, and Chromatiales is controversial and requires further study and revisions. Based on our analysis, we strongly support reclassification of Magnetococcales as a separate class Etaproteobacteria. From our results, we conclude that concatenated trees of conserved proteins are a more accurate method for phylogenetic analysis, as compared to other methods used.

Indexed as

AlphaproteobacteriaGammaproteobacteriaBacterial ProteinsPhylogenyProteobacteriaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacterial ProteinsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID35704242
OpenAlexW4282975561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.