ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022
Augmented reality navigation with ultrasound-assisted point cloud registration for percutaneous ablation of liver tumors.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- More than meets the eye: Augmented reality in surgical oncology.Journal of surgical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of augmented reality visualization approaches in minimally invasive neurosurgery guidance: 2D, tablet, HMD and autostereoscopic displays.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Precision surgery in the era of 3D visualization, AR/VR, and 3D printing: current applications and future directions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Point cloud registration algorithm using liver vascular skeleton feature with computed tomography and ultrasonography image fusion.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Applications of mixed reality with medical imaging for training and clinical practice.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Review
- Feasibility evaluation of radiotherapy positioning system guided by augmented reality and point cloud registration.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Modern Image-Guided Surgery: A Narrative Review of Medical Image Processing and Visualization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- 3D reconstruction for maxillary anterior tooth crown based on shape and pose estimation networks.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeWe present a novel augmented reality (AR) surgical navigation method with ultrasound-assisted point cloud registration for percutaneous ablation of liver tumors. A preliminary study is carried out to verify its feasibility.
methodsTwo three-dimensional (3D) point clouds of the liver surface are derived from the preoperative images and intraoperative tracked US images, respectively. To compensate for the soft tissue deformation, the point cloud registration between the preoperative images and the liver is performed using the non-rigid iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. A 3D AR device based on integral videography technology is designed to accurately display naked-eye 3D images for surgical navigation. Based on the above registration, naked-eye 3D images of the liver surface, planning path, entry points, and tumor can be overlaid in situ through our 3D AR device. Finally, the AR-guided targeting accuracy is evaluated through entry point positioning.
resultsExperiments on both the liver phantom and in vitro pork liver were conducted. Several entry points on the liver surface were used to evaluate the targeting accuracy. The preliminary validation on the liver phantom showed average entry-point errors (EPEs) of 2.34 ± 0.45 mm, 2.25 ± 0.72 mm, 2.71 ± 0.82 mm, and 2.50 ± 1.11 mm at distinct US point cloud coverage rates of 100%, 75%, 50%, and 25%, respectively. The average EPEs of the deformed pork liver were 4.49 ± 1.88 mm and 5.02 ± 2.03 mm at the coverage rates of 100% and 75%, and the average covered-entry-point errors (CEPEs) were 4.96 ± 2.05 mm and 2.97 ± 1.37 mm at 50% and 25%, respectively.
conclusionExperimental outcomes demonstrate that the proposed AR navigation method based on US-assisted point cloud registration has achieved an acceptable targeting accuracy on the liver surface even in the case of liver deformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.