ArticleJournal of neurology2022
Modulation of spontaneous motor unit potentials by a new motor cortical magnetic stimulation method in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comparison of electromyography techniques: surface versus intramuscular recording.European journal of applied physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) show altered cortical excitability. In this study, we measure modulation of spontaneous motor unit potentials (sMUPs) in hand muscles by multifocal cortical stimulation with a newly developed wearable transcranial rotating permanent magnet stimulator (TRPMS).
methodsWe conducted cross-sectional and longitudinal electromyographic assessments in 40 and 20 ALS patients, respectively, of the stimulation-induced peak increase in the count of sMUPs in two hand muscles modulated by unilateral TRPMS stimulation of the primary motor cortex. We measured peak sMUP counts during several short sessions consisting of 10 stimuli over 60 s and 30 s post-stimulation periods. The longitudinal component involved an initial assessment at an early stage of the disease and up to five follow-up assessments at least 3 months apart.
resultsTRPMS stimulation produced no device-related adverse effects. It showed an inverted V-shaped modulation of the peak sMUP counts as a function of ALS functional rating scale revised scores. The ratios of ALS subjects showing peak sMUP count increases between early and intermediate stages (χ2 = 4.086, df = 1, p = 0.043) and intermediate and late stages (χ2 = 4.29, df = 1, p = 0.038) in cross-sectional data were significantly different. Longitudinal assessment also produced a significant (z = 2.31, p = 0.021) result, with all subjects showing a post-initial visit increase in peak sMUP counts.
conclusionsThese results are consistent with delayed onset of upper motor neuronal dysfunction with respect to onset of clinical features. However, the above results need to be confirmed in a larger sample of patients and with multiple lines of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.