ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2022
CRISPR-CasB technology in forensic DNA analysis: challenges and solutions.
Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Past, Present and Future Perspectives of Forensic Genetics.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Weaponized genomics: potential threats to international and human security.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas technology has revolutionized the field of biotechnology with its precise therapeutic use from genetic as well as infectious diseases point of view. This technology is rapidly evolving to single tool enabling site-directed cut in the genome and highly specific activation or inhibition of gene expression or the exchange of single bases. Besides clinical applications, CRISPR-Cas technology has also shown promising use in the field of forensic DNA analysis. Enrichment of targeted genetic marker for identification followed by sequencing and non-PCR-dependent technique ensures the use of CRISPR-Cas technology in challenging forensic biological samples. The use of this advanced technology is also deemed helpful in mixed profile attribution, mostly in LCN contributors and the generation of a useful DNA profile in degraded samples. Besides its useful applications in forensic DNA analysis, CRISPR-Cas technology poses a huge threat from the generation of ghost DNA profiles by modification/alteration of target genetic markers. Forensic DNA analysts should carry out analysis of additional markers such as non-CODIS markers, Y-, X-chromosome markers, and mitochondrial DNA sequencing in a suspected ghost DNA profile case. KEY POINTS: • CRISPR-Cas9 technique is useful in analyzing LCN, mixed and degraded samples • Alteration of DNA using this technique can lead to generation of ghost DNA profiles • Alternative genetic markers and methylation pattern may detect a ghost DNA profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.