Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35704048›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2022

A new conceptional model for deriving average dermal absorption estimates from studies with multiple tested concentrations for non-dietary risk assessment of pesticides.

Felix M Kluxen, Edgars Felkers, Steve McEuen, Philip Fisher, Christian Strupp, Christine Lorez, Jeanne Y Domoradzki, Christiane Wiemann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Felix M KluxenADAMA Deutschland GmbH, Edmund-Rumpler-Str. 6, 51149, Cologne, Germany. felix.kluxen@adama.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4516-5477
Edgars FelkersADAMA Deutschland GmbH, Edmund-Rumpler-Str. 6, 51149, Cologne, Germany.
Steve McEuenFMC Corporation, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Philip FisherCrop Science Division, Bayer SAS, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Christian StruppGowan Crop Protection Ltd., Reading, UK.
Christine LorezSyngenta Crop Protection AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Jeanne Y DomoradzkiCorteva Agriscience, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Christiane WiemannBASF Oesterreich GmbH, Vienna, Austria.
Adama Science and Technology University · ETBayer (France) · FRCorteva (United States) · USFMC (United States) · USSyngenta (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dermal absorption values are used to translate external dermal exposure into potential systemic exposure for non-dietary risk assessment of pesticides. While the Environmental Protection Agency of the United States of America (US EPA) derives a common dermal absorption factor for active substances covering all related products, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) requests specific product-based estimates for individual concentrations covering the intended use rates. The latter poses challenges, because it disconnects exposure dose from applied dose in absorption studies, which may not be suitable in scenarios where concentration is not relevant. We analyzed the EFSA dermal absorption database, collected 33 human in vitro studies from CropLife Europe (CLE) companies, where ≥3 in-use dilution concentrations were tested, and 15 dermal absorption triple pack datasets. This shows that absolute dermal absorption correlates with absolute applied dose on a decadic logarithm-scale, which is concordant with the toxicological axiom that risk is driven by exposure dose. This method is radically different from the current European approach focused on concentrations and offers new insights into the relationship of internal and external exposure doses when utilizing data from in vitro studies. A single average dermal absorption value can be simply derived from studies with multiple tested concentrations, by calculating the y-intercept of a linear model on a decadic logarithm scale while assuming a slope of 1. This simplifies risk assessment and frees resources to explore exposure refinements. It also serves as a basis to harmonize dermal absorption estimation globally for use in exposure-driven risk assessments.

Indexed as

PesticidesFood SafetyHumansRisk AssessmentSkin AbsorptionUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyPesticidesDermal absorptionExposure assessmentPesticidesPlant protection productsRisk assessmentSimplified risk assessment

Identifiers

PMID35704048
PMCPMC9325830
OpenAlexW4282963692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.