Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35703984›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2022

Potential Biomarker Identification by RNA-Seq Analysis in Antibiotic-Related Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS): A Pilot Study.

Ying Xin Teo, Wei Yann Haw, Andreas Vallejo, Carolann McGuire, Jeongmin Woo, Peter Simon Friedmann, Marta Ewa Polak, Michael Roger Ardern-Jones

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ying Xin TeoClinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6936-3895
Wei Yann HawClinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Andreas VallejoClinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Carolann McGuireClinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Jeongmin WooClinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Peter Simon FriedmannClinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Marta Ewa PolakClinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Michael Roger Ardern-JonesClinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
University of Southampton · GBSouthampton General Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 109377/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 203141/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most severe forms of cutaneous adverse drug reactions is "drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms" (DRESS), hence subsequent avoidance of the causal drug is imperative. However, attribution of drug culpability in DRESS is challenging and standard skin allergy tests are not recommended due to patient safety reasons. Whilst incidence of DRESS is relatively low, between 1:1000 and 1:10 000 drug exposures, antibiotics are a commoner cause of DRESS and absence of confirmatory diagnostic test can result in unnecessary avoidance of efficacious treatment. We therefore sought to identify potential biomarkers for development of a diagnostic test in antibiotic-associated DRESS. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from a "discovery" cohort (n = 5) challenged to causative antibiotic or control were analyzed for transcriptomic profile. A panel of genes was then tested in a validation cohort (n = 6) and compared with tolerant controls and other inflammatory conditions which can clinically mimic DRESS. A scoring system to identify presence of drug hypersensitivity was developed based on gene expression alterations of this panel. The DRESS transcriptomic panel identified antibiotic-DRESS cases in a validation cohort but was not altered in other inflammatory conditions. Machine learning or differential expression selection of a biomarker panel consisting of 6 genes (STAC, GPR183, CD40, CISH, CD4, and CCL8) showed high sensitivity and specificity (100% and 85.7%-100%, respectively) for identification of the culprit drug in these cohorts of antibiotic-associated DRESS. Further work is required to determine whether the same panel can be repeated for larger cohorts, different medications, and other T-cell-mediated drug hypersensitivity reactions.

Indexed as

Drug Hypersensitivity SyndromeEosinophiliaAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersHumansLeukocytes, MononuclearPilot ProjectsRNA-SeqAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersbiomarkerdiagnosticsdrug allergydrug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)immunology

Identifiers

PMID35703984
PMCPMC9412178
OpenAlexW4282971640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.