Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35703582›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2023

Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot.

Melinda M Davis, Jen Coury, Jean Hiebert Larson, Rose Gunn, Elke Geiger Towey, Andrea Ketelhut, Mary Patzel, Katrina Ramsey, Gloria D Coronado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Facilitation of Health Plan-Clinic Partnerships to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening for Rural Medicaid Enrollees: A Qualitative Study.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Comparative effectiveness of two interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening among females living in the rural Midwest.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. It Is a Good Idea, but Are They Willing? Assessing Pharmacist Willingness to Deliver Colorectal Cancer Screening.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Where Should the Cancer Control Interventions Target: A Geospatial Hotspot Analysis for Major Cancer Mortality 2018 to 2022 in the United States.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Colorectal cancer: local results and significance in Hungary.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Engaging with Rural Communities for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Using Modified Boot Camp Translation.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Melinda M DavisOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3293-5113
Jen CouryOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Jean Hiebert LarsonOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Rose GunnOCHIN, Inc., Portland, Oregon, USA.
Elke Geiger ToweyPacificSource Community Solutions, Bend, Oregon, USA.
Andrea KetelhutPacificSource Community Solutions, Bend, Oregon, USA.
Mary PatzelOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Katrina RamseyBiostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design (BERD) Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Gloria D CoronadoCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Funding

Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute - The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR002369 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Cynthia D Morris, Christopher G. Slatore · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
Using Context to Improve Implementation of Evidenced-based Interventions for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Primary Care (Precise CRC)K07CA211971 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, MELINDA MARIE · 2017 to 2020
$683k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002369NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002369NCI NIH HHS 1K07CA211971-01A1NCI NIH HHS K07 CA211971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. We piloted a collaborative mailed FIT program with health plans and rural clinics to evaluate preliminary effectiveness and refine implementation strategies.

methodsWe conducted a single-arm study using a convergent, parallel mixed-methods design to evaluate the implementation of a collaborative mailed FIT program. Enrollees were identified using health plan claims and confirmed via clinic scrub. The intervention included a vendor-delivered automated phone call (auto-call) prompt, FIT mailing, and reminder auto-call; clinics were encouraged to make live reminder calls. Practice facilitation was the primary implementation strategy. At 12 months post mailing, we assessed the rates of: (1) mailed FIT return and (2) completion of any CRC screening. We took fieldnotes and conducted postintervention key informant interviews to assess implementation outcomes (eg, feasibility, acceptability, and adaptations).

resultsOne hundred and sixty-nine Medicaid or Medicare enrollees were mailed a FIT. Over the 12-month intervention, 62 participants (37%) completed screening of which 21% completed the mailed FIT (most were returned within 3 months), and 15% screened by other methods (FITs distributed in-clinic, colonoscopy). Enrollee demographics and the reminder call may encourage mailed FIT completion. Program feasibility and acceptability was high and supported by perceived positive benefit, alignment with existing workflows, adequate staffing, and practice facilitation.

conclusionCollaborative health plan-clinic mailed FIT programs are feasible and acceptable for implementation in rural clinics and support CRC screening completion. Studies that pragmatically test collaborative approaches to mailed FIT and patient navigation follow-up after abnormal FIT and support broad scale-up in rural settings are needed.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMedicareAgedEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningOccult BloodPrimary Health CareUnited Statescolorectal cancercommunity-based participatory researchimplementation sciencemailed fecal immunochemical tests (FIT)primary health carerural health services

Identifiers

PMID35703582
PMCPMC9969840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.