Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35703481›Full record

ArticleAnatolian journal of cardiology2022

Does Coronary Vasospasm Show a Better Prognosis in Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Data from the Korean Cardiac Arrest Research Consortium (KoCARC) Registry.

Hyo Eun Park, Sang-Hoon Na, Sang Do Shin, Jin Wi, Sang-Hyun Kim, Jinho Choi, Jong-Il Choi, Youngjin Cho, Myung-Jin Cha, Kyung-Hee Kim

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatolian journal of cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Coronary artery spasm in cardiac arrest survivors.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hyo Eun ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Sang-Hoon NaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Sang Do ShinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Jin WiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Sang-Hyun KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Jinho ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Jong-Il ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Youngjin ChoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Myung-Jin ChaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Kyung-Hee KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Sejong General Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Seoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious cohort studies focused on relative risk stratification among patients diagnosed with vasospastic angina, and it is unknown how much vasospasm accounts for the cause of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and whether prognosis differs.

methodsFrom a registry data collected from 65 hospitals in Korea, 863 subjects who survived hospital cardiac arrest were evaluated. The patients with insignificant coro- nary lesion, vasospasm, and obstructive lesion were each grouped as group I, group II, and group III, respectively. The primary and secondary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge and good neurological function at discharge defined as cerebral performance index 1.

resultsAt hospital discharge, 529 subjects (61.3%) survived. There was no significant dif- ference in survival according to coronary angiographic findings (P = .133 and P = .357, group II and group III compared to group I), but the neurological outcome was significantly bet- ter in groups II and III (P = .046 and P = .022, groups II and III compared to group I). Two mul- tivariate models were evaluated to adjust traditional risk factors and cardiac biomarkers. The presence of coronary artery vasospasm did not affect survival to hospital discharge (P = 0.060 and P = .162 for both models), but neurological function was significantly better (OR: 1.965, 95% CI: 1.048-3.684, P = .035, and OR: 1.706, 95% CI: 1.012-2.878, P = .045 for vasospasm, models I and II, respectively).

conclusionsCoronary vasospasm does not show better survival to hospital discharge, but shows better neurological outcomes. Aggressive coronary angiography and intensive medical treatment for adequate control of vasospasm should be emphasized to prevent and manage fatal events.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationCoronary VasospasmOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestCoronary AngiographyHumansPrognosisRegistries

Identifiers

PMID35703481
PMCPMC9361063
OpenAlexW4281389271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.