Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35703458›Full record

ArticlePerceptual and motor skills2022

Increased Cognitive Demands Affect Agility Performance in Female Athletes - Implications for Testing and Training of Agility in Team Ball Sports.

Daniel Büchel, Alli Gokeler, Pieter Heuvelmans, Jochen Baumeister

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perceptual and motor skills, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel BüchelExercise Science & Neuroscience Unit, Department Sports & Health, 26578Paderborn University, Paderborn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1451-5393
Alli GokelerExercise Science & Neuroscience Unit, Department Sports & Health, 26578Paderborn University, Paderborn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6427-4225
Pieter HeuvelmansExercise Science & Neuroscience Unit, Department Sports & Health, 26578Paderborn University, Paderborn, Germany.
Jochen BaumeisterExercise Science & Neuroscience Unit, Department Sports & Health, 26578Paderborn University, Paderborn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agility, a key component of team ball sports, describes an athlete´s ability to move fast in response to changing environments. While agility requires basic cognitive functions like processing speed, it also requires more complex cognitive processes like working memory and inhibition. Yet, most agility tests restrict an assessment of cognitive processes to simple reactive times that lack ecological validity. Our aim in this study was to assess agility performance by means of total time on two agility tests with matched motor demands but with both low and high cognitive demands. We tested 22 female team athletes on SpeedCourt, using a simple agility test (SAT) that measured only processing speed and a complex agility test (CAT) that required working memory and inhibition. We found excellent to good reliability for both our SAT (ICC = .79) and CAT (ICC =.70). Lower agility performance on the CAT was associated with increased agility total time and split times (

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceAthletesCognitionFemaleHumansReproducibility of Resultsagilitycognitioncomplex speedlearning and memoryspeedcourtteam sports

Identifiers

PMID35703458
PMCPMC9301166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.